Elaboration likelihood model
By A. Sunmade. 2008
617 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4c470da54a63f164683794fbb4f28753815042c7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Anuj K. Shah
- Joshua M. Parcha
- P. Briñol
- Till Grüne-Yanoff
- C. Sia
- Catherine Y. Kingsley Westerman
- Thomas Koch
- Luk Warlop
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Zakary L. Tormala
- Derek D. Rucker
- Daniel M. Oppenheimer
- Joshua M. Parcha
- P. Briñol
- Till Grüne-Yanoff
- C. Sia
- Catherine Y. Kingsley Westerman
In Statistics and Probability
- Joshua M. Parcha
- P. Briñol
- Till Grüne-Yanoff
- C. Sia
- Catherine Y. Kingsley Westerman
- Thomas Koch
- Timothy Hayes
- Benjamin D. Horne
Citations in the corpus
- Whatever People Say I Am That's What I Am: Social Labeling As a Social Marketing Tool (2007, background): “When cognitive resources are scarce, people are not capable of processing message characteristics carefully, and tend to rely on peripherical cues, like a social label (Chaiken, 1987; Petty & Cacioppo, 1986).”
- Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations (2009, background): “Past literature suggests that motivation, ability, and opportunity could infl uence the relationship between the informational and normative determinants and the reader’s perceived information credibility [54, 68, 71].”
- When Debunking Scientific Myths Fails (and When It Does Not) (2016, methodology): “In this context, researchers have developed different models to describe two modes of cognitive processing and decision making (e.g., Chaiken, 1980; Kahneman & Frederick, 2002; Petty & Cacioppo, 1986), which are commonly labeled as dual process theories (Evans, 2008).”
- Social Influence on consumer decisions: Motives, modes, and consequences (2012, methodology): “Independence between motives and modes of processing is a cornerstone of the dual-mode processing models of persuasion (heuristic/systematic model, Chaiken & Legerwood, 2012; elaboration likelihood model, Petty & Briñol, 2012).”
- Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty (2014, background): “…D.D., et al., Consumer conviction and commitm Psychology (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.001 distinct from resistance (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) as attitudes that are never attacked might differentially persist as time passes, and attitudes that uniformly persist across a given…”
- This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News (2017, background): “When controlling for attention and individual differences in the need to engage with information, the relevant arguments and message characteristics become the determinant in persuasion and attitude change (OKeefe 2008).”
- How Corporate Social Advocacy Affects Attitude Change Toward Controversial Social Issues (2020, background): “Involvement is one of the most important variables in determining whether an individual is motivated to engage in issue-relevant thinking (Carpenter, 2015; O’Keefe, 2013) because it can be used to predict whether a persuasive message will be centrally or peripherally processed.”
- A Review and Conceptual Framework for Understanding Personalized Matching Effects in Persuasion (2020, background): “Decades of research have striven to describe and model the fundamental underlying processes of attitude change (for reviews, see Bri~nol & Petty, 2012; Eagly & Chaiken, 1993; Maio et al., 2019), and much of this research has been unified and integrated under the ELM (Petty & Bri~nol, 2012; Petty & W”