Information system innovations and supply chain management: Channel relationships and firm performance

By Daekwan Kim, S. Tamer Cavusgil, Roger J. Calantone. 2006

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4bc7eddfd7d0e37e372465cd0617f90ea65f893f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings (2015, methodology): “…from a review of prior meta-analytic and leading studies such as Damanpour (1991) and Birkinshaw, Hamel and Mol (2008). and Sanz-Valle, 2011; Kim et al., 2006); (2) used a definition of MI incompatible with the definition we adopted in this study (Garcia-Morales et al., 2008); (3) used the…”
The Key Role of Managers’ Values in Exporting: Influence on Customer Responsiveness and Export Performance (2010, background): “…values may ultimately affect firm performance, it has been argued that resources, whether at the firm or individual level, should be converted to capabilities or strategic choice before influencing firm performance (Chadwick and Dabu 2009; Kim, Cavusgil, and Calantone 2006; Wang et al. 2009).”
From a systematic literature review to integrated definition for sustainable supply chain innovation (SSCI) (2017, neutral): “From the innovation approach perspective, innovation can be grouped into technological innovation and administrative innovation for supply chain management (Kim et al., 2006).”
The effects of supplier involvement and knowledge protection on product innovation in customer-supplier relationships: a study of global automotive suppliers in China (2014, methodology): “For supplier relationship performance, we adapted three items from Kim et al. (2006) to describe the extent to which the relationship had led to improvements in terms of cost reduction, sales growth and profitability.”
An Investigation of Visibility and Flexibility as Complements to Supply Chain Analytics: An Organizational Information Processing Theory Perspective (2018, methodology): “To measure SCMS usage, we adapted items from Srinivasan and Swink (2015), based on deﬁnitions of inter-organizational systems developed by Bensaou and Venkatraman (1995), Kim et al. (2006) and Bowersox et al. (1999).”
The interactive effects of sales control systems on salesperson performance: a job demands–resources perspective (2013, result): “7%) for all scales and that the average magnitude of method variance is comparable with those of other recent marketing studies (e.g., Carson 2007; Kim et al. 2006).”