From a systematic literature review to integrated definition for sustainable supply chain innovation (SSCI)

By De Gao, Zhiduan Xu, Yi Ruan, Haiyan Lu. 2017

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Environmental Sustainability in Third-Party Logistics Service Providers: A Systematic Literature Review from 2000–2016 (2018, methodology): “This searching procedure is widely accepted and has been adopted in previous literature reviews [18,21,22,32,33].”
Understanding big data analytics capabilities in supply chain management: Unravelling the issues, challenges and implications for practice (2017, methodology): “Similar approach is also used by Gao et al. (2016) and Seuring and Müller (2008) in analysing past research papers.”
A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology (2018, background): “…Kannan, and Haq 2018) and have emphasised the importance of sustainable innovation in SSCM (Hall 2001; Verghese and Lewis 2007; Isaksson, Johansson, and Fischer 2010; Boons et al. 2013; Zailani et al. 2015; Costantini et al. 2017; Gao et al. 2017; Gupta and Barua 2017; de Vargas Mores et al. 2018).”
Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the last decade (2019, methodology): “To determine the country of the study, if conflicts existed, the nationality of the first author was taken as reference, which is a common approach in review studies (e.g., Gao et al .”