Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research

By W. B. Cissell. 2004

851 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b734e25f1f80ef9846ece5b705dc963ebf4ea6a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating organizational-level work stress interventions: Beyond traditional methods (2007, result): “Steckler and Linnan (2002) have explained this increase in a way consistent with the current argument.”
Organizational interventions: A research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects (2013, background): “In public health research, the focus of evaluation is primarily on whether individuals change their own behaviours (e.g. Rossi, Lipsey, & Freeman, 2004; Steckler & Linnan, 2002).”
Opening the black box: Presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions (2013, background): “…development, and organizational change (Armenakis & Bedeian, 1999; Burke & Litwin, 1992; Cummings & Worley, 2009; Rossi, Lipsey, & Freeman, 2004; Steckler & Linnan, 2002), and many of the factors and elements identified in these disciplines may also be relevant in a model of the evaluation of…”
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance (2015, background): “7 On the other hand, positive outcomes can sometimes be achieved even when an intervention was not delivered fully as intended.”
Process evaluation for organizational stress and well-being interventions: Implications for theory, method, and practice. (2014, background): “…Nielsen et al., 2007; Nielsen, Taris, & Cox, 2010; Randall et al., 2005), occupational health and safety (Baril-Gingras, Bellemare, & Brisson, 2012), crime prevention (Pawson, 2008; Pawson & Tilley, 1997; Ray, 2005), and public health (Roen, Arai, Roberts, & Popay, 2006; Steckler & Linnan, 2002).”
How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. (2007, background): “different levels of implementation (95).”