Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond

By S. Lowe. 2016

2,705 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a8937e6401f7a88d6846d7e466b68657bd7b8d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The mediating role of competitive strategy in international entrepreneurial orientation (2016, methodology): “This is a useful qualitative method for the study of social phenomena with a small number of data that is able to properly handle uncertainty (Ragin, 2000, 2008).”
Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method (2017, methodology): “FsQCA in entrepreneurship and innovation research By focusing explicitly on localizing causal complexity, the fsQCA method may contribute to business and management research (Fiss 2007; Ragin 2008b).”
The Triple Bottom Line on Sustainable Product Innovation Performance in SMEs: A Mixed Methods Approach (2019, methodology): “To address the configurations that lead to PIP (H7) or its absence (H8), we followed the recommendations of Ragin [71] and Fiss [54].”
Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: towards an integrated framework (2016, methodology): “The objective of the calibration procedure is to transform variable raw scores into set measures based on the observed score distribution, rescaling the original measure into scores ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 (Ragin 2008).”
An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis (2017, methodology): “Following Ragin (2008), fsQCA assigns membership values to conditions on a scale from 0.0 (non-membership) to 1.0 (full membership), with 0.5 as the cross-over point or point of maximum ambiguity.”
Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (2014, methodology): “…in a specific category is binary (i.e., the cases are either members or non-members in this category), the respective set is called “crisp set” (Ragin, 2008); therefore, crisp sets record a value of 1 for cases with membership in the given category (or simple condition) and 0 for…”
Mapping out the sharing economy: A configurational approach to sharing business modeling (2017, methodology): “pattern recognition are ill-equipped to deal with complex causality, we conducted a novel fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA), which is a set-theoretic method and a member of a family of analytical techniques designed to visualize and analyze causal complexity, while retaining the ri”
When do Dynamic Capabilities Lead to Competitive Advantage? The Importance of Strategic Fit (2018, unknown): “As such, configurational theory provides the basis to identify patterns of attributes associated with a particular outcome (Ragin, 2008).”
From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power (2014, methodology): “QCA is a set-theoretic approach that applies Boolean logic to identify necessary and sufficient conditions for an outcome (Ragin, 2000, 2008).”
Understanding Employee Motivation and Organizational Performance: Arguments for a Set-Theoretic Approach (2016, methodology): “and whether there is only one combination or several different combinations of conditions (causal recipes) capable of generating the same outcome (Ragin, 2008).”
Toward a Configurational Perspective on the CEO (2016, background): “Conjunction and asymmetry refer to the notions that any individual approach may be insufficient and that there may not be direct reciprocal or inverse causal effects of the different components in a given configuration, respectively (Greckhamer; Ragin, 2008; Wagemann & Schneider, 2012).”
Sustainability Matter and Financial Performance of Companies (2017, methodology): “Since its initial development in the mid-1980s at [74], and extended to the current year by the work of Ragin [75], Cronqvist and Berg-Schlosser [76], QCA methodology has spread successfully across the disciplines of business administration and management (see [12,77–80]).”
The Role of Teacher Leadership in How Principals Influence Classroom Instruction and Student Learning (2016, background): “The “net effects approach” (Ragin 2008) inherent in our SEM analysis estimates the importance of each pathway linking leadership and student achievement, controlling for all other pathways.”
Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools (2020, methodology): “Different approaches offer several tools for addressing measurement error (Cooper and Glaesser 2016b; Emmenegger, Schraff, and Walter 2014; Greckhamer et al. 2013; Maggetti and Levi-Faur 2013; Ragin 2008a; Rohlfing and Schneider 2014; Skaaning 2011; Thiem 2014a; Thiem, Spöhel, et al. 2016).”
Explaining success and failure in the commons: the configural nature of Ostrom's institutional design principles (2016, unknown): “QCA, proposed and refined by Ragin (1987, 2006, 2008), allows for the comparison of case studies with respect to specific outcome variables.”
Revisiting the study of policy failures (2016, background): “Contemporary advances in causal process-tracing and fuzzy-set methodology allow for more explanatory rigour and stronger theory development than can be found in any of these examples (Blatter and Haverland 2012; Ragin 2008).”