Toward a Configurational Perspective on the CEO

By John R. Busenbark, Ryan Krause, Steven Boivie, Scott D. Graffin. 2016

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5672db3997692697068f57d8e8a60cb2ea98d59d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. James B. Wade
2. Christophe Boone
3. Tine Buyl

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. James B. Wade
2. Christophe Boone
3. Tine Buyl

Citations in the corpus

• Making CEO Narcissism Research Great: A Review and Meta-Analysis of CEO Narcissism (2019, unknown): “Future studies based on upper echelons theory may benefit from using a more configural approach (Busenbark et al., 2016).”
• CEO Narcissism, Risk-Taking, and Resilience: An Empirical Analysis in U.S. Commercial Banks (2019, background): “Second, we extend both the UE and the CG literatures by our interactive approach (Busenbark et al., 2016)—that is, the combination of CEO narcissism and poor CG practices erodes organizations’ resilience to shocks.”
• Rethinking ‘Top-Down’ and ‘Bottom-Up’ Roles of Top and Middle Managers in Organizational Change: Implications for Employee Support (2017, unknown): “…Bentein, and Panaccio, 2014) and role agency more specifically (Floyd and Lane, 2000; Mantere, 2008), as well as configurational theorizing (Busenbark et al., 2015; Meyer, Tsui, and Hinings, 1993) to develop novel insights towards understanding the role of different managerial echelons in…”