Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method
By Sascha Kraus, Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano, Miriam Schüssler. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2017
640 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4af85b45a3c816d6a0fb3bcb10a8ab1d5fa6390e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- David Pickernell
- Malcolm John Beynon
- Paul Jones
- Lucía Muñoz-Pascual
- Carla Maria Marques Curado
- Mohamed Yacine Haddoud
- Jesús Galende
- W. Nowiński
Citations in the corpus
- The Triple Bottom Line on Sustainable Product Innovation Performance in SMEs: A Mixed Methods Approach (2019, methodology): “Moreover, their combination is relevant when looking for the causes and conditions that lead companies to sustainable PIP [61].”
- Country-level entrepreneurial attitudes and activity through the years: A panel data analysis using fsQCA (2020, background): “As identified in Marcotte (2013), this is a specific measure of entrepreneurial activity focused on the emergence of new activity in small business establishments.”
- The role of inspiring role models in enhancing entrepreneurial intention (2019, result): “Thus, the paper supports previous evidence (Beynon et al., 2016; Kraus et al., 2018; Rey-Martí, Ribeiro-Soriano, & Sánchez-García, 2016) on the applicability of the complexity approach and fsQCA in the context of entrepreneurship research.”