Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: a critical appraisal using new evidence
By D. Otley, Raili Pollanen. 2000
191 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49bbd64ca9ced55567ea5b5ec04f366f22c8558f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Klaus Derfuss
- Utz Schäffer
- Sven Modell
- Franziska Fischer
- Michael Burkert
- A. Goddard
- Robert W. Scapens
- Henk J. ter Bogt
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Leadership Styles and Use of Performance Measures on Managerial Work-Related Attitudes (2010, unknown): “Hartmann, 2000 ; Otley and Fakiolas, 2000 ; Pollanen and Otley, 2000 ; Noeverman et al.”
- Application of the Controllability Principle and Managerial Performance: The Role of Role Perceptions (2011, methodology): “This instrument is frequently applied in contemporary management accounting studies (Chong and Chong, 2002; Hall, 2008; Marginson and Ogden, 2005a; Otley and Pollanen, 2000; Parker and Kyj, 2006).”
- Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications (2005, background): “Finally, Otley and Pollanen (2000)attempted to resolve some conflicting results of a range of studies extending the works ofHopwood (1972)andOtley (1978).”
- The Relationship of Budgetary Participation and Reliance on Accounting Performance Measures with Individual-Level Consequent Variables: A Meta-Analysis (2009, background): “Conversely, preconfigured samples might help control for environmental or organisational influences (Otley and Pollanen, 2000 ) that otherwise might hide processes of interest.”
- Reducing conflict in balanced scorecard evaluations (2007, background): “Subsequent studies (e.g., Hartmann, 2000; Otley & Pollanen, 2000) have similarly provided evidence suggesting that, depending on various contextual factors, negative consequences (e.g., job-related tension and distrust in supervisor) may result from the reliance on conventional accounting measures…”