The Effects of Leadership Styles and Use of Performance Measures on Managerial Work-Related Attitudes

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Upper echelons theory in management accounting and control research (2014, background): “However, Hartmann et al. (2010) presented evidence that a clearly considerate leadership style – unlike a structuring leadership style – positively influences the subordinates’ perceived clarity of their individual goals (classified in Table 2 as part of the governance structure and thus…”
Examining a Positive Psychological Role for Performance Measures (2014, unknown): “R 2 values), together with the size of the structural path coefficients (Hartmann et al., 2010).”
Performance Management in Universities: Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems (2012, background): “In addition, the relationships between performance, performance evaluation, motivation and job-related tension have received considerable attention over the years (see, for example, Brownell, 1982; Dunk, 1993; Hartmann, 2000; Hartmann et al., 2010).”
The effects of uncertainty on the roles of controllers and budgets: an exploratory study (2011, unknown): “Recently Hartmann et al. (2010) showed that the evaluation styles may be multidimensional and comprise both general leadership characteristics and the choice of (non-)financial performance metrics.”