Reducing conflict in balanced scorecard evaluations

By Bernard Wong-On-Wing, Lan Guo, Wei Li, Dan Yang. 2007

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c247ddcad14851006329a06c287a20ebb9decb6f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Christopher D. Ittner
2. David F. Larcker
3. John E. Core
4. Jean-François Henri

In Management Information Systems

1. Christopher D. Ittner
2. Jean-François Henri
3. David F. Larcker
4. John E. Core

Citations in the corpus

• Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence (2008, background): “…evaluations (Banker et al., 2004), enhance accountants’ evaluation of benchmark data that require the assessment of cause-and-effect relations (Vera-Munoz et al., 2007), and reduce conflicts between supervisors and subordinates in Balanced Scorecard evaluations (Wong-On-Wing et al., 2007).”
• Fifty-Year Overview of Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting (2011, unknown): “Banker et al. (2004) and Wong-On-Wing et al. (2007) both found that encouraging evaluators to consider strategy helped to reduce decision bias.”