On the Psychology of Loss Aversion: Possession, Valence, and Reversals of the Endowment Effect
By Lyle A. Brenner, Yuval Rottenstreich, Sanjay Sood, Baler Bilgin. 2007
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49686f8d7d6b51c8a2722f40fcb3f9a87c96d8a9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- J. Zaichkowsky
- S. Dommer
- Shane Frederick
- Oliver Schilke
- Carolin Neuhaus
- Bernd Weber
- Vanitha Swaminathan
- M. Reimann
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
- S. Dommer
- Marco Escadas
- Kent Walker
- Shane Frederick
- Marjan S. Jalali
- Oliver Schilke
- Minoo Farhangmehr
- Vanitha Swaminathan
Citations in the corpus
- A Reference Price Theory of the Endowment Effect (2012, background): “Although the pain of losing may also play a role, the typical characterization of the endowment effect as “the tendency to place a larger value on an item when it is in one’s possession” (Brenner et al. 2007, p. 369) seems, at best, incomplete. However, any theoretical account of the endowment effec”
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging in consumer research: A review and application (2011, background): “…intention to trade a product and loss aversion, an issue that others have raised previously in the marketing literature (Ariely, Huber, & Wertenbroch, 2005; Brenner et al., 2007; Nayakankuppam & Mishra, 2005; Novemsky & Kahneman, 2005b; Strahilevitz & Loewenstein, 1998; Zhang & Fishbach, 2005).”
- Explaining the Endowment Effect through Ownership: The Role of Identity, Gender, and Self-Threat (2013, methodology): “This also implies that other moderators of the endowment effect context including specific emotions, and attributes of a good that have focused on loss aversion explanations, could be reexamined using an ownership lens (Ariely, Huber, and Wertenbroch 2005; Brenner et al. 2007; Carmon and Ariely 2000”
- The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications (2012, background): “differently, and that we are more sensitive to losses than we are to equivalent gains (Brenner et al. 2007).”
- Why bad feelings predict good behaviours: The role of positive and negative anticipated emotions on consumer ethical decision making (2019, background): “According to loss aversion theory, individuals are more sensitive to losses than to commensurate gains (Abdellaoui et al., 2007; Brenner et al., 2007; Camerer, 2005), and therefore, in the context of the current study, appeared more sensitive to potential negative future emotions than to potential…”