Impact of Rater Personality on Transformational and Transactional Leadership Ratings

By J. Bono, A. Hooper, D. Yoon. 2012

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/48e253a77c0f2b33c68b0919e91ac55ac88d6e24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Michael S. Cole
2. Jeremy B. Bernerth
3. H. J. Walker
4. Erik C. Taylor
5. R. Lord
6. B. Schyns
7. A. Hirschi
8. S. Hannah

In Social Psychology

1. B. Schyns
2. T. Hansbrough
3. H. J. Walker
4. Erik C. Taylor
5. R. Lord
6. Michael S. Cole
7. Jeremy B. Bernerth
8. D. van Knippenberg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. H. J. Walker
2. Erik C. Taylor
3. R. Lord
4. B. Schyns
5. Michael S. Cole
6. Jeremy B. Bernerth

Citations in the corpus

• Reconsidering the accuracy of follower leadership ratings (2015, background): “The urgency around this issue is illustrated by concerns about the extent towhich transformational leader behaviors are “in the eye of the beholder” (Bono et al., 2012; Brown & Keeping, 2005; Jung, Yammarino, & Lee, 2009; Yammarino et al., 1998). Thus generalizing from one rater to another is proble”
• Control Variables in Leadership Research: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review (2017, result): “Our approach, while not universally accepted, is consistent with other scholars (e.g., Bono et al., 2012) and even notable meta-analyses (e.g., Bono & Judge, 2004; DeRue et al., 2011).”