Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple‐choice tests

By Rune Andreassen, Ivar Bråten. 2009

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47fa72e156d028db6aea3f5e9c0b9530af7e6124

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. J. R. García
2. K. Cain
3. Selma Babayiğit
4. Kate Nation
5. Y. Chiu
6. Y. Kim
7. Jane Oakhill
8. Amy M. Elleman

In Statistics and Probability

1. J. R. García
2. K. Cain
3. Selma Babayiğit
4. Y. Kim
5. Kate Nation
6. Y. Chiu
7. Jane Oakhill

Citations in the corpus

• The Role of Oral Language Skills in Reading and Listening Comprehension of Text: A Comparison of Monolingual (L1) and Bilingual (L2) Speakers of English Language. (2014, background): “General limitations and future research The way in which text comprehension is assessed may have direct implications for the observed pattern of results (Andreassen & Bråten, 2009; Cutting & Scarborough, 2006; Keenan & Betjemann, 2006).”
• Decoding and Reading Comprehension (2014, result): “This pattern is supported by other work (Andreassen & Bråten, 2010).”