Substrate Fate in Activated Macrophages: A Comparison between Innate, Classic, and Alternative Activation

By Juan-Carlos Rodríguez-Prados, Paqui G Través, J. Cuenca, Daniel Rico, Julián Aragonés, P. Martín-Sanz, Marta Cascante, L. Boscá. Journal of Immunology, 2010

997 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Macrophages play a relevant role in innate and adaptive immunity depending on the balance of the stimuli received. From an analytical and functional point of view, macrophage stimulation can be segregated into three main modes, as follows: innate, classic, and alternative pathways. These differential activations result in the expression of specific sets of genes involved in the release of pro- or anti-inflammatory stimuli. In the present work, we have analyzed whether specific metabolic patterns depend on the signaling pathway activated. A [1,2-13C2]glucose tracer-based metabolomics approach has been used to characterize the metabolic flux distributions in macrophages stimulated through the classic, innate, and alternative pathways. Using this methodology combined with mass isotopomer distribution analysis of the new formed metabolites, the data show that activated macrophages are essentially glycolytic cells, and a clear cutoff between the classic/innate activation and the alternative pathway exists. Interestingly, macrophage activation through LPS/IFN-γ or TLR-2, -3, -4, and -9 results in similar flux distribution patterns regardless of the pathway activated. However, stimulation through the alternative pathway has minor metabolic effects. The molecular basis of the differences between these two types of behavior involves a switch in the expression of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (PFK2) from the liver type-PFK2 to the more active ubiquitous PFK2 isoenzyme, which responds to Hif-1α activation and increases fructose-2,6-bisphosphate concentration and the glycolytic flux. However, using macrophages targeted for Hif-1α, the switch of PFK2 isoenzymes still occurs in LPS/IFN-γ–activated macrophages, suggesting that this pathway regulates ubiquitous PFK2 expression through Hif-1α-independent mechanisms.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Immunology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4745b9e1d1ed2f441b75d35f6c5c7718a98c5e9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. A. Chawla
  2. A. Mantovani
  3. C. A. Dinarello
  4. K. Ganeshan
  5. Edward J. Pearce
  6. Luke A. O'Neill

In Immunology

  1. C. Garlanda
  2. A. Mantovani
  3. C. A. Dinarello
  4. Luke A. O'Neill
  5. P. Italiani
  6. D. Boraschi
  7. K. Ganeshan
  8. Edward J. Pearce

In Molecular Biology

  1. C. Garlanda
  2. A. Mantovani
  3. A. Chawla
  4. G. Harry
  5. Alexey A. Sergushichev
  6. C. McPherson
  7. C. A. Dinarello
  8. K. Ganeshan

Citations in the corpus