Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy
By Vittorio Chiesa, Andrea Piccaluga. 2000
353 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/472e3807ea010ce8317dd83e3f114c0e6ef88a29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Holger Patzelt
- Massimo G. Colombo
- Evila Piva
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Rosa Grimaldi
- Imad Rherrad
In Economics and Econometrics
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Holger Patzelt
- Evila Piva
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Nabil Amara
- Réjean Landry
- Massimo G. Colombo
- Dieter Franz Kogler
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Holger Patzelt
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Frank T. Rothaermel
- Rosa Grimaldi
- Evila Piva
- Réjean Landry
- Nabil Amara
Citations in the corpus
- Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation (2006, background): “7 Recent articles include: Klofsten and Jones-Evans (2000), Chiesa and Piccaluga (2000), Etzkowitz (2002), Molas-Gallart et al.”
- Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models (2005, background): “Although the main goal of universities is education, they can still make substantial contributions to local economies through research leading to patentable inventions and discoveries, faculty spin-off ventures, and technology transfers (Mansfield, 1990; Varga, 1999; Chiesa and Piccaluga, 2000; Schu”
- Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities (2006, background): “…of university research as well as a tangible implementation of the entrepreneurial vision of university research (Fontes, 2003; Clarysse and Moray, 2004; Chiesa and Piccaluga, 2000; Jones-Evans and Magnus, 1998; Roberts, 1991; Carayannis et al., 1998; Smilor et al., 1990; Shane, 2004; O’Shea et…”
- Harnessing University Entrepreneurship for Economic Growth (2013, background): “…example, find that entrepreneurship and industry partnerships often clash with “traditional” academic norms manifested in tenure, peer review, and public research support (Bercovitz & Feldman, 2004; Chiesa & Piccaluga, 2000; Franklin et al., 2001; Samson & Gurdon, 1993; Slaughter & Rhoades, 2004).”
- University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “Resource scarcity refers to inadequate funding and inadequate structural support (Kinsella and McBrierty, 1997; Chiesa and Piccaluga, 2000).”
- A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development (2010, background): “According to Mustar et al. (2006), distinctions can be made between studies focusing on the actual economic activity carried out (Chiesa and Piccaluga, 2000), the process of transforming knowledge or prior experience into economic value (Aggarwal and Bayus, 2002; Druilhe and Garnsey, 2004), and the…”
- Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs (2009, result): “Thus, our sample is similar to other studies on academic entrepreneurship in Europe with respect to share of technologybased firms (Chiesa & Piccaluga, 2000) and average number of employees (Heirman & Clarysse, 2004).”
- Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer (2013, neutral): “This growing research interest coincides with a growing recognition among policymakers of the need to place more emphasis on knowledge creation and exploitation in the form of entrepreneurship by universities (Chiesa and Piccaluga, 2000).”
- Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: A comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups (2012, background): “The teams of academic NTBFs seldom include individuals with prior professional experience in the private sector (Chiesa and Piccaluga, 2000; O’Boyle, 1984).”
- A systematic literature review of the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of social entrepreneurial intention of students (2020, neutral): “The investigation of other aspects of the university’s ESS such as business incubation and spin-offs (Chiesa & Piccaluga, 2000; Hughes, Ireland, & Morgan, 2007; Markuerkiaga, Caiazza, Igartua, & Errasti, 2016; Mian, 1996, 1997), technology transfer mechanisms (Bray & Lee, 2000; Etzkowitz, 2003;…”
- In search of the profit-maximizing actor: motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs (2011, background): “Furthermore, the traditional mission of the university is teaching, basic research, and knowledge dissemination; thus, there are many structural and cultural barriers within to inhibit technology commercialization (Bercovitz and Feldman 2008; Chiesa and Piccaluga 2000; Kenney and Goe 2003; Markman”