Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer

By Samantha R. Bradley, Christopher S. Hayter, Albert N. Link. 2013

275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a5c6d264e9c91558ab50605cbcf929e64594aa4b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Perceived Obstacles to University–Industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments (2014, background): “Bradley, Hayter, and Link (2013) identify informational and cultural barriers such as insufficient rewards for university researchers, U-I culture clashes, bureaucratic inflexibility, unskilled and understaffed Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs), lack of entrepreneurial talent in the university,…”
A theoretical analysis of the role of social networks in entrepreneurship (2014, background): “11 See Siegel et al, 2007 and Bradley et al. 2013 for reviews of the technology transfer literature.”
The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model (2015, methodology): “To this end, we have also een guided by several technology transfer literature reviews (e.g. domavicius et al., 2008; Agrawal, 2003; Tran and Kocaoglu, 2009; rotogerou et al., 2012; Bradley et al., 2013).”
Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs (2016, background): “2 See Bradley et al. (2013a) for a detailed discussion of the emergence of the patent-centric, linear model of technology transfer among most research universities within the United States.”
Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, background): “…mechanism that combines entrepreneurship education, mentoring, networking, and technology development services, often in combination with modest levels of funding to support entrepreneurial activities (Bradley et al. 2013b; Gulbranson and Audretsch 2008; Maia and Claro 2013; Munari et al. 2016).”