Designing sociable robots
By Cynthia Lynn Breazeal. 2002
1,743 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4470ebf06b3b329fd19bafb25c0d0693b439fd6c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
- Kerstin Dautenhahn
- W. B. Knox
- Peter Stone
- Christoph Bartneck
- Andrea Lockerd Thomaz
- Frederic Kaplan
- Rosalind W. Picard
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Kerstin Dautenhahn
- W. B. Knox
- Peter Stone
- Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
- Christoph Bartneck
- Frederic Kaplan
- Kazuyoshi Wada
- Takanori Shibata
In Social Psychology
- Kerstin Dautenhahn
- Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
- Christoph Bartneck
- W. B. Knox
- T. Fong
- Kurt Gray
- Kazuyoshi Wada
- Takanori Shibata
Citations in the corpus
- A survey of socially interactive robots (2003, background): “…and functions, ranging from robots whose sole purpose and only task is to engage people in social interactions (Kismet, Cog, etc.) to robots that are engineered to adhere to social norms in order to fulfill a range of tasks in human-inhabited environments (Pearl, Sage, etc.)[19] [118] [130] [143].”
- Time to Give Up the Dogmas of Attribution (2011, background): “Another takes advantage of humans’ tendency to infer mental states from facial expressions and designs robots that display emotions (Breazeal, 2004).”
- Teachable robots: Understanding human teaching behavior to build more effective robot learners (2008, background): “To be most effective, the robot should reveal its internal state in a manner that is intuitive for the human partner (Breazeal, 2002; Arkin et al., 2003).”
- How Humans Teach Agents - A New Experimental Perspective (2012, background): “Given the different strengths of human and computational agents, we expect both to play an important role in future behavioral studies, a view shared by some in the human-robot interaction community [6, 9, 22].”
- A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction (2004, background): “Several of these approaches are driven by technological advances that enable more natural and lifelike human-robot interactions (Breazeal, 2003; Brooks, 2002).”
- Title of paper : KASPAR – A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research (2009, neutral): “When Breazeal (2002) designed Kismet (Figure 3), which " …is designed to have an infant-like appearance of a fanciful robotic creature " (Breazeal, 2002, p.51), with a youthful and appealing appearance, her intention was not to rival but rather to connect to the social competence of people.”
- Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. (2016, background): “, 2014), shoppers (Qiu & Benbasat, 2010), companions (Breazeal, 2002), pop stars (Hutchinson, 2014), and perhaps even our lovers (Garland, 2015; Jonze, 2013; Meadows, 2010; but see Hancock, 2014).”
- Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data (2011, background): “Discovering interfaces between higher-level representations of minds and actions on the one hand and planned and emergent coordination on the other may provide psychologists studying human perception, action, and cognition with the opportunity to have a major impact on the design of robots that are ”
- Case Studies in Interdisciplinary Research (2011, neutral): “9 See (Breazeal, 2004) for more on this.”
- A Conceptual and Computational Model of Moral Decision Making in Human and Artificial Agents (2010, background): “7 system’s rational faculties, such as affective skills (Picard 1997), sociability (Breazeal 2002), embodied cognition (Brooks 2002; Glenberg 1997), theory of”
- Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. (2012, background): “Now, with modern robotics capable of making more and more lifelike entities (Breazeal & Scassellati, 2002; Brooks, 2002), the possibility an artificial human is no longer science fiction.”
- Full-Body Compliant Human–Humanoid Interaction: Balancing in the Presence of Unknown External Forces (2007, background): “Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TRO.2007.904896 form in an individual context but also through its impact on the relationship between humans and robots.”
- Toward sociable robots (2003, methodology): “Due to space limitations, we refer the interested reader to [6] for a detailed presentation of Kismet's overall design.”
- "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. (2012, background): “One overarching finding in the field of human–robot interaction (HRI) is that in varying ways and to varying degrees, people behave socially with robots (Breazeal, 2002; Fong, Nourbakhsh, & Dautenhahn, 2003; Kanda, Hirano, Eaton, & Ishiguro, 2004; Tanaka, Cicourel, & Movellan, 2007).”
- Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work (2012, background): “…away from focusing on automation and the labour process, and towards psychological and cognitive perspectives that explore robot sociability (Breazeal 2002, Sabonovic et al. 2006) and human-robot interaction (Hinds et al. 2004), reflecting the increased prevalence of professional and…”
- Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation (2003, background): “Many advances have been made in producing robots whose behavior exhibits recognizable emotions such as surprise and delight [4].”