A Conceptual and Computational Model of Moral Decision Making in Human and Artificial Agents
By Wendell Wallach, S. Franklin, C. Allen. 2010
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Matthias Scheutz
- Bertram F. Malle
- Thomas Arnold
- Seth D. Baum
- Tim Miller
- Joshua Knobe
- James R. Beebe
- Wesley Buckwalter
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey of Artificial General Intelligence Projects for Ethics, Risk, and Policy (2017, background): “There have been several prior surveys of R&D on AGI and related technologies (Chong et al. 2007; Duch et al. 2008; Langley et al. 2008; de Garis et al. 2010; Goertzel et al. 2010; Samsonovich 2010; Taatgen and Anderson 2010; Thórisson and Helgasson 2012; Dong and Franklin 2014; Goertzel 2014; Kotser”
- Sacrifice One For the Good of Many? People Apply Different Moral Norms to Human and Robot Agents (2015, background): “But even if the architectures can keep pace (with attempts underway seen in [28]–[30]), a critical question is what capacities people want robots to have—what kinds of moral decisions and judgments robots ought to make and what norms they should obey.”