A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction

By Christoph Bartneck, Jodi L. Forlizzi. RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759), 2004

431 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d7ed125456723313d435d4136e1c9d1331bed75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

In Ocean Engineering

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

From Proxemics Theory to Socially-Aware Navigation: A Survey (2014, background): “Robot may imitate human social norms and show a consistent set of behaviors [11] that have common sense [10].”
Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots (2009, methodology): “We can not offer an exhaustive framework for the perception of robots similar to the frameworks that have already been developed for social robots [9–11] that would justify”
Trust in humanoid robots: implications for services marketing (2019, background): “Existing research in services marketing (Collier et al., 2014; Curran and Meuter, 2005; Gelbrich and Sattler, 2014) highlights the need to understand the adoption of SSTs in a public service setting, and of service robots in particular (Bartneck and Forlizzi, 2004).”
Service robots in hotels: understanding the service quality perceptions of human-robot interaction (2019, background): “Thus, the term service robot has been used to describe “ an autonomous or semi-autonomous robot that interacts and communicates with humans by following behavioral norms expected by the people with whom the robot is intended to interact (Bartneck & Forlizzi, 2004, p. 592).”
Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction (2012, methodology): “The role of the physically visible design of robotic products has been discussed and investigated by designers [8] [19] [36].”