Toward sociable robots

By Cynthia Lynn Breazeal. Robotics Auton. Syst., 2003

962 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/592e694911499b7506045f731a88186cc0eca640

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley. (2016, background): “Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cognition journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate /COGNIT Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.008 0010-0277/ 2015 The Authors.”
From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: the importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction (2018, neutral): “…machine denies responsibility for the costly act (Kim et al. 2004, 2006) Empathise machine expresses empathy for the occurrence of the costly act (Breazeal 2003; riek et al. 2009) Emotionally regulate machine identifies negative trigger and adds normative statement to stay positive (Jung,…”
From high-touch to high-tech: COVID-19 drives robotics adoption (2020, background): “With the development of artificial intelligence (AI), robots are becoming equipped with “ social intelligence ” – the capability to be socially aware and able to interpret emotional signals and react as would a real human being (Breazeal, 2003; Lazzeri et al., 2013).”
Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration (2010, background): “For instance, it is projected that we will live with ‘social robots’ (Breazeal 2003) or ‘artificial companions’ that may act as artificial pets, provide information services, take care of home security, assist health care, or perform household tasks (Floridi 2008; Dautenhahn et al. 2005).”
Development environments for autonomous mobile robots: A survey (2007, background): “, 2006), and the study of social robotics (e.g., Bruce et al., 2002; Breazeal, 2003) will become commonplace.”
Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task (2004, background): “Comparatively few studies are conducted in actual task conditions where the main purpose is the work rather than data collection (e.g., Breazeal, 2003; Fong, Thorpe, & Baur, 2001; Kawamura, Nilas, Muguruma, Adams, & Zhou, 2003; Kiesler & Goetz, 2002; Langle & Worn, 2001; Severinson-Eklundh, Green,”
A survey of socially interactive robots (2003, background): “In [19], Breazeal defines four classes of social robots in terms of: (1) how well the robot can support the social model that is ascribed to it and (2) the complexity of the interaction scenario that can be supported as follows.”
Robotics and Autonomous Systems (2014, positive): “As interactions between humans and robots becomemore complex, there is increasing interest in building robots that can interact with humans in more intuitive and meaningful ways [43]; robots such as the Fish–Bird wheelchairs [44], Robota the humanoid doll [15], KASPAR [22,25,45], and Paro the roboti”
Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction (2006, background): “…for these social robots to function well in the above-mentioned roles, a plethora of literature has suggested that it is critical for them to have intimate and effective social interaction with humans (Breazeal, 2003; Duffy, 2003; Fong et al., 2003; Severinson-Eklundh, Green, & Huttenrauch, 2003).”
Cooperating with machines (2017, background): “eap talk (i.e., costless signals) is important to human cooperation in repeated interactions [15, 16], as it helps people coordinate quickly on desirable equilibrium and create shared representations [18, 19, 20, 21]. As such, in addition to generating effective strategic behavior, a fourth importan”
From Trolley to Autonomous Vehicle: Perceptions of Responsibility and Moral Norms in Traffic Accidents with Self-Driving Cars (2016, background): “[19] (78% of participants said a robot should select a utilitarian choice and 65% said a human should).”
Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction (2007, positive): “These robots require deep models of social cognition (Breazeal 2002, 2003).”
Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot (2003, methodology): “1 According to a taxonomy introduced by Breazeal [3], a robot”
40 years of cognitive architectures: core cognitive abilities and practical applications (2018, background): “Although itsmotivationalmechanisms are hard-coded,Kismet demonstrates one of thewidest repertoire of emotional responses of all the cognitive architectures we reviewed (Breazeal 2003a).”
Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children (2004, background): “Can robotic pets, compared to biological pets, provide children with similar developmental outcomes (Druin & Hendler, 2000; Pérez-Granados, 2002; Turkle, 2000)? How do children conceive of this genre of robots? It is a genre that some researchers have begun to refer to as “social robots” (Bartneck &”
Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction (2012, background): “Breazeal [28] and later extended by Fong et al.”