Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making

By A. Glöckner, Cilia Witteman. 2010

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22a044cf4ae95bf6d63375681b2c50d2363aa4b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Development and Validation of a New Measure of Intuition: The Types of Intuition Scale (2014, background): “We agree with Glöckner and Witteman (2010) that intuition is not a unitary construct.”
Trust: An Integrative Review from a Person–Situation Perspective (2015, background): “Thus, the question of how different sources of information are integrated and to what extent intuitive versus deliberate cognitive processes are at work (cf. Betsch & Glöckner, 2010; Glöckner & Witteman, 2010) is largely unanswered.”
Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012, background): “…are driven by clear “perceptual” patterns or environmental cues, rely on learned associations or on relatively effortless recognition/retrieval processes, or are formed on the basis of a simple decision heuristic (e.g. Frederick, 2002; Glöckner & Witteman, 2010; Hogarth, 2005; Kahneman, 2003).”
Intuition in Judgment and Decision Making: Extensive Thinking Without Effort (2010, background): “This assertion, however, does not preclude that there might also be other automatic mechanisms involved in decision making (see Glöckner & Witteman, 2010a, for a discussion).”
Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition (2012, background): “Examples of these other typologies include Dane and Pratt (2009) who distinguish problem solving, moral and creative intuitions; Glöckner and Witteman (2009) who differentiate associative, matching, accumulative and constructive intuitions; and Gore and Sadler-Smith (2011) who identify…”
The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory (2014, background): “For instance, Kaufman (2011) suggests that, during generative thinking, unconscious cognitive processes activated through defocused attention are more prevalent, whereas, during exploratory thinking, controlled cognition activated by focused attention becomes more prevalent.”
Intuition: A Challenge for Psychological Research on Decision Making (2010, background): “Glöckner and Witteman (2010a) correctly pointed out that these four categories of intuition are not completely distinct but that because they capture somewhat different phenomena, it pays to make the distinction.”
Intuition in Management Research: A Historical Review (2012, neutral): “…decision making (Koele and Dietvorst, 2009), frequency estimation (Haberstroth, 2008), intuition and fast and frugal heuristics (Glöckner, 2008), different types of intuition (Glöckner and Witteman, 2010), and the relative utilities of conscious versus non-conscious processing (Dijksterhuis, 2004).”