Jonathan A. Fugelsang
Cognitive Neuroscience · 2012–2015
A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 18 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 36 citations into it; #4,066 of 10,852 by trust here, #4,352 by citations
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 33 citations into it
- Social Psychology — 31 citations into it
- Sociology and Political Science — 26 citations into it; #8,139 of 22,756 by trust here, #7,052 by citations
- General Decision Sciences — 23 citations into it
- Developmental and Educational Psychology — 16 citations into it
- Statistics and Probability — 16 citations into it
- Cognitive Science & Psychology — 8 citations into it
Whom Jonathan A. Fugelsang trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- K. Stanovich
- Dan Kahan
- Jonathan Haidt
- Daniel Kahneman
- M. Toplak
- R. F. West
- Joshua D. Greene
- David G. Rand
- Liane Gabora
- Jonathan Evans
Who trusts Jonathan A. Fugelsang overall
Papers from Jonathan A. Fugelsang's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jonathan A. Fugelsang trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. (Psychology Review)
- What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought
- The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (Memory & Cognition)
- A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (American Psychologist)
- Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. (Psychology Review)
- Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection (Judgment and Decision Making)
- Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation (Nature Communications)
- Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. (Cognition)
- When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize
- Morality (Perspectives on Psychological Science)
Their papers
- On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit (2015) — 421 citations
- Everyday Consequences of Analytic Thinking (2015) — 266 citations
- Reducing the Sex Difference in Math Anxiety: The Role of Spatial Processing Ability. (2012) — 131 citations
- The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values (2014) — 154 citations
- Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought (2015) — 111 citations
- On the relation between math and spatial ability: The case of math anxiety (2015) — 149 citations