A Dual Process Account of Creative Thinking
By A. Allen, Kevin Thomas. 2011
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4af756e71d2b637cac19c4e4aff403e7c690e59
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Paul T. Sowden
- Andrew Pringle
- Gordon Pennycook
- Jonathan A. Fugelsang
- Nathaniel Barr
- Jennifer A. Stolz
- Jiang Qiu
- Tengbin Huo
In General Decision Sciences
- Andrew Pringle
- Liane Gabora
- Nathaniel Barr
- Paul T. Sowden
- Gordon Pennycook
- Jonathan A. Fugelsang
- Jennifer A. Stolz
- Scott Barry Kaufman
Citations in the corpus
- Opening up Openness to Experience: A Four-Factor Model and Relations to Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. (2013, background): “…years, dual-process theories of cognition have become increasingly required for explaining cognitive, personality, and social processes (e.g., Allen & Thomas, 2011; Epstein, 1994, 2003; Evans, 2008, 2010; Evans & Frankish, 2009; Gilhooly & Murphy, 2005; Gilhooly & Fioratou, 2009; Kahneman,…”
- The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory (2014, background): “However, an assumption underlying several measures of creativity (e.g., the Alternate Uses Test and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking) is that creativity requires only divergent thinking, the generation of many different ideas.”
- The relation between semantic memory structure, associative abilities, and verbal and figural creativity (2020, background): “…suggesting the role of associative abilities as an important predictor of creative thinking that represents a valid elementary cognitive ability underlying creative thinking (Allen & Thomas, 2011; Barr et al., 2015; Beaty et al., 2014; Gabora, 2010; Kleinmintz et al., 2019; Sowden et al., 2015).”
- Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought (2015, methodology): “…relatively more or less analytic thinking is beneficial to the creative process and attempt to understand the interplay between distinct types of thinking in creativity, formalising previous suggestions that the study of creativity could benefit from a DPT perspective (see Allen & Thomas, 2011).”