Nathaniel Barr

Cognitive Neuroscience · 2014–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 18 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Cognitive Neuroscience — 43 citations into it; #5,484 of 10,852 by trust here, #5,162 by citations
• Social Psychology — 27 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 27 citations into it; #11,337 of 22,756 by trust here, #8,704 by citations
• General Decision Sciences — 26 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 19 citations into it
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 8 citations into it
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 8 citations into it
• Philosophy — 8 citations into it; #691 of 1,040 by trust here, #318 by citations

Whom Nathaniel Barr trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. K. Stanovich
2. Liane Gabora
3. Jonathan Haidt
4. Daniel Kahneman
5. M. Toplak
6. R. F. West
7. A. Allen
8. Paul J Silvia
9. Roger E. Beaty
10. Gordon Pennycook

Who trusts Nathaniel Barr overall

1. Gordon Pennycook
2. Tomas Ståhl

Papers from Nathaniel Barr's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Nathaniel Barr trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin
2. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. (Psychology Review)
3. What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought
4. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. (Psychology Review)
5. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (American Psychologist)
6. Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory?
7. The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (Memory & Cognition)
8. Thinking fast and slow.
9. When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize
10. Morality (Perspectives on Psychological Science)

Their papers

• On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit (2015) — 421 citations
• Analytic-thinking predicts hoax beliefs and helping behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) — 87 citations
• The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values (2014) — 154 citations
• Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought (2015) — 111 citations