Leadership style and organizational commitment: Mediating effect of role stress.
By Kathleen M. Dale, M. L. Fox. 2008
169 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4347b21ff8d22809b23fe1adb53a108d3d3c481a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. Skogstad
- Staale Einarsen
- Lars Glasø
- Julian Childs
- Joachim Stoeber
- Jørn Hetland
- F. Ebrahim
- Sunday Samson Babalola
Citations in the corpus
- Is avoidant leadership a root cause of subordinate stress? Longitudinal relationships between laissez-faire leadership and role ambiguity (2014, result): “More recent studies have also confirmed a negative relationship between showing Consideration and Initiating Structure, and measures of role ambiguity and role stress (Dale & Fox, 2008; O’Driscoll & Beehr, 1994).”
- Do you want me to be perfect? Two longitudinal studies on socially prescribed perfectionism, stress and burnout in the workplace (2012, methodology): “The RSS is a widely used measure of work stress and has demonstrated reliability and validity in numerous studies (e.g. Dale & Fox, 2008; Thomas & Lankau, 2009).”
- The Effect Of Leadership Style, Job Satisfaction And Employee-Supervisor Relationship On Job Performance And Organizational Commitment (2016, background): “The current findings are in agreement with prior studies, which suggest that perceived leadership influences organizational commitment (Dale & Fox, 2008).”
- Leadership styles and organizational commitment: literature review (2016, background): “It is to be taken into consideration that previous researchers have demonstrated that leadership styles have an impact on the level of organizational commitment of subordinates (Chen, 2004; Dale and Fox, 2008; Lok and Crawford, 1999, 2004; Rowden, 2000).”
- An Empirical Assessment of Demographic Factors, Organizational Ranks and Organizational Commitment (2010, background): “It is also important to foster good communication with employees and establish a comfortable rapport, encourage the employees to offer input and consider carefully what is said (Fox & Dale, 2008).”