Category salience and organizational identification
By Rolf van Dick, U. Wagner, Jost Stellmacher, Oliver Christ. 2005
157 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42e29d6d3019b3a25099776787932296ef3b75f0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Heike Bruch
- Tom Tyler
- Linda J. Martin
- Barbara van Knippenberg
- Michael S. Cole
- D. van Knippenberg
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Thomas W. H. Ng
Citations in the corpus
- Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter? (2006, background): “According to self-categorization theory, individuals are more likely to view themselves as members of a social group when the social context makes salient other groups (e.g., van Dick, Wagner, Stellmacher, & Christ, 2005 ).”
- Process‐orientation versus outcome‐orientation during organizational change: the role of organizational identification (2006, background): “It is therefore for instance positively related to satisfaction and job involvement (van Knippenberg & van Schie, 2000) and negatively related to turnover intentions (Van Dick et al., 2004) and actual turnover (Mael & Ashforth, 1995).”