Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value

By Hee-Jae Cho, V. Pucik. 2005

1,058 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/429892c9fb29fc71e584b9af6fd8e31c727c4725

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Product innovation, budgetary control, and the financial performance of firms (2011, background): “Consequently, product innovation is often characterized as being critically important to a firm’s performance (e.g. Balkin, Markman, & Gomez-Mejia, 2000; Cho & Pucik, 2005; Li & Atuahene-Gima, 2001; Prajogo & Ahmed, 2006).”
Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value (2006, methodology): “Although FAMA has ratings of CSR, innovativeness capability, and product quality for approximately 580 firms (Cho and Pucik 2005; Fortune 2005) and ACSI has data on approximately 190 firms/brands (Fornell et al. 1996; Fornell et al. 2006; Gruca and Rego 2005; Morgan and Rego 2006), we were not able…”
Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation (2014, methodology): “Innovativeness capability refers to a firm’s ability to accumulate and apply its knowledge stock to produce new technologies, new products/services, and other new fronts (Cho and Pucik 2005; Hauser et al. 2006).”
Determinants of Firm Performance: A Subjective Model (2016, neutral): “Superior financial performance is a way to satisfy investors (Chakravarthy, 1986) and it can be represented by profitability, growth and market value (Cho and Pucik, 2005 and to each other.”
Do Environmental Management Systems Improve Business Performance in an International Setting (2008, background): “As suggested by Cho and Pucik (2005) , two measures for an organization's performance are employed: profitability and growth performance.”
Innovation, quality management and learning: Short-term and longer-term effects (2017, background): “While product quality is considered a crucial element to competitive advantage (Tellis et al., 2009; Choi and Pucik, 2005; Calantone et al., 1996), Molina-Castillo et al.”
Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms (2013, positive): “However, Cho and Pucik (2005) actually found a recursive association from growth to profitability when using a structural equation modeling approach.”