Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing.

By Larissa Z. Tiedens, S. Linton. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001

1,393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fe3343d1f908270f067acebc0463590d284abf3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In General Decision Sciences

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Emotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical Evidence (2007, background): “States of anger and disgust seem to decrease the depth of processing and increase the reliance on stereotyping and other heuristic cues, apparently because these states trigger a sense of certainty (Bodenhausen, Sheppard, & Kramer, 1994; Tiedens & Linton, 2001).”
Self‐Validation of Cognitive Responses to Advertisements (2004, background): “When confidence is induced prior to ad exposure, and elaboration is not constrained to be high or low, confidence might affect the extent of information processing, with confident people engaging in less thought than people lacking in confidence (see Tiedens and Linton 2001).”
Unsure what the future will bring? You may overindulge: Uncertainty increases the appeal of wants over shoulds (2012, positive): “The elicitation procedure employed was adapted from a procedure developed by Strack, Schwarz, and Gschneidinger (1985) to manipulate emotions and validated in several subsequent studies (see Keltner et al., 1993; Lerner and Keltner 2001; Tiedens and Linton, 2001; and Dunn and Schweitzer, 2005).”
The Influence of Anger, Fear, and Emotion Regulation on Ethical Decision Making (2013, background): “Tiedens and Linton (2001) and others have found that feelings of certainty result in heuristic information processing, while feelings of uncertainty result in systematic processing to reduce the uncertainty (Chaiken, Liberman, & Eagley, 1989; Lerner & Tiedens, 2006; Mackie, Devos, & Smith, 2000;…”
Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (2004, background): “…message, but lose 4 When confidence is induced prior to message exposure, and elaboration is not constrained to be high or low, confidence might affect the extent of information processing, with confident people engaging in less thought than people lacking in confidence (Tiedens & Linton, 2001).”
The Confronting Prejudiced Responses (CPR) Model: Applying CPR in Organizations (2008, background): “This is because anger is an emotion associated with high certainty and perceived situational control (Smith & Ellsworth, 1985), and such emotions elicit more heuristic than systematic processing (Tiedens & Linton, 2001).”
Body posture effects on self‐evaluation: A self‐validation approach (2009, background): “Specifically, confidence has been argued to reduce the motivation to think, whereas doubt- and uncertainty-related states are often associated with more information processing (Briñol, Petty, & Wheeler, 2006; Petty, Tormala, Briñol, & Jarvis, 2006; Tiedens & Linton, 2001; Weary & Jacobson, 1997).”
On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments (2003, background): “tive priming (e.g., Bower, 1981), the mood-as-information model (Martin, Abend, Sedikides, & Green, 1997), judgment under emotional certainty or uncertainty ( Tiedens & Linton, 2001 ), the social intuitionist model (e.g., Haidt, 2001), sober second thought (J. S. Lerner, Goldberg, & Tetlock, 1998), ”