Qualitative Reading Inventory-4
By L. Leslie, J. Caldwell. 2005
471 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fc8728727c52e7d9f2b0ffd44b50894d83eba5b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Steven J. Amendum
- Kristin Conradi
- Rebecca S. Betjemann
- J. Keenan
- E. Hiebert
- Yore Kedem
- Katie Snyder
- D. P. Sukhram
Citations in the corpus
- TWA + PLANS Strategies for Expository Reading and Writing: Effects for Nine Fourth-Grade Students (2006, methodology): “Test Goals Reading Inventory-3, Leslie & Caldwell, 2001) were used to corroborate the accuracy of identification criteria.”
- Does Text Complexity Matter in the Elementary Grades? A Research Synthesis of Text Difficulty and Elementary Students’ Reading Fluency and Comprehension (2017, background): “At the same time, there is little evidence to suggest that Betts ’ guidelines –– or various adaptations of Betts, like those used by Fountas and Pinnell (1996), Leslie and Caldwell (2011), or Morris (2008) — hold any standing (e.g., Cunningham 2013).”
- Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test Without Reading It: Why Comprehension Tests Should Not Include Passage-Independent Items (2006, methodology): “We also used three listening comprehension measures: the Woodcock–Johnson Oral Comprehension standard score, the Qualitative Reading Inventory listening composite score, and a composite of the comprehension questions from the Know-It task (Barnes, Dennis, & Haefele-Kalvaitis, 1996).”