Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Learners' Epistemic Criteria for Good Scientific Models. (2011, background): “Students also proposed seven high-level communicative criteria (e.g.,models are clear, appropriately detailed, etc.), which philosophers have argued play a central role in the uptake of scientific ideas (Bishop and Trout, 2005).”
On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning. (2012, background): “Researchers working in the heuristics and biases tradition tend to be so-called Meliorists (see Bishop & Trout, 2005; Doherty, 2003; Larrick, 2004; Stanovich, 1999, 2004).”
On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance (2018, background): “We have drawn on other philosophical sources as well, including work by reliabilist epistemologists (e.g., Bishop & Trout, 2005; A. Goldman, 1986).”
Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology (2011, background): “Whether learners adopt aims in line with their judgments of value is likely to depend on their judgments of the costs of pursuing the aims relative to the value of the resulting achievements (Bishop & Trout, 2005).”