Self-Reported GPA and SAT: A Methodological Note
By J. Cassady. 2001
215 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ed94876cc89241adcdb1dcb56fd0d15257f62d1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- David M. Condon
- Germine H. Awad
- S. Glynn
- Marcus Crede
- Stephen R. Porter
- William Revelle
- Jeffrey Rosen
- Kevin Cokley
Citations in the corpus
- On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases (2008, background): “Several studies have indicated that the correlation between self-reported SATs and verified SAT scores is in the range of .80 to .90 (Cassady, 2001; Kuncel, Crede, & Thomas, 2005).”
- Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science (2011, background): “Under such conditions, self-reported information has been found to be reliable (Cassady, 2001).”
- Components of School Engagement Among African American Adolescents (2005, background): “97 (Bogenschneider, 1997; Cassady, 2001; Dornbusch, Ritter, Leiderman, Roberts, & Fraleigh, 1987).”
- Understanding Student Self-Reports of Academic Performance and Course-Taking Behavior (2017, methodology): “Cassady (2001) found self-reported GPA in a sample of college students to be accurate, based on correlations between self-reported GPA and official university records (r = .97).”
- The Validity of Self-Reported Grade Point Averages, Class Ranks, and Test Scores: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature (2005, methodology): “…have held generally negative views of using self-reported GPA (e.g., Goldman, Flake, & Matheson, 1990), while others have argued in favor of using self-reported GPA (e.g., Cassady, 2001), arguing that the relationship, although imperfect, is close enough for research and practical purposes.”
- The Reliability, Validity, and Utility of Self-Assessment (2006, methodology): “97) when students selfreported GPA and SAT scores when applying to graduate school (Cassady, 2001; Talento-Miller & Peyton, 2006); i.”
- The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. (2007, background): “Research conducted by Zimmerman and colleagues (Zimmerman, 1995; Zimmerman & Schunk, 2001, 2004) has found that self-regulating learners set proximal, attainable goals; are learning- rather than achievement-oriented; have an understanding that different learning tasks require different strategies…”
- Effects of Programmatic Selectivity on the Academic Achievement, Academic Self-Concepts, and Aspirations of Gifted College Students (2007, background): “Some researchers have found correlations between self-reported SAT scores and actual SAT scores to be in the range of .60 and .80 (Cassady, 2001; Goldman, Flake, & Matheson, 1990), and others (e.g., Shepperd, 1993) strongly caution against using self-reported SAT scores.”
- A Preliminary Investigation of Academic Disidentification, Racial Identity, and Academic Achievement Among African American Adolescents (2011, methodology): “97 between self-reported GPA and official records (Cassady, 2001), it is advised that self-reported GPA data of African American students be used with caution (Zimmerman, Caldwell, & Bernat, 2002).”
- Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation (2007, background): “Under such conditions, self-reported GPA has been found to be reliable (Cassady, 2001).”
- My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: the revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement (2015, unknown): “Although self-report measures of this kind are subject to memory distortions or bias, research indicates that the extent of these biases is typically small (Cassady, 2001).”
- Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions (2008, unknown): “In the critical thinking literature, the ability to evaluate evidence and arguments independently of one’s prior beliefs and opinions is a skill that is strongly emphasized (Baron, 1991, 2000; Ennis, 1987, 1996; Perkins, 1995; Sternberg, 1997, 2001, 2003).”
- The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure (2014, background): “Several researchers have demonstrated the reduced reliability of self-reported scores in relation to official test records (Cassady, 2001; Cole & Gonyea, 2009; Kuncel, Crede, & Thomas, 2005; Mayer et al., 2006), citing participants' desire to misrepresent their performance and/or memory errors as th”
- Information, Experience, and Divergent Thinking: An Empirical Test (2006, background): “Of some relevance is the research showing self-reported GPAs to be surprisingly accurate (Cassady, 2001).”