The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis

By Cathy Cavanaugh. 2001

444 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e1b05b1788b3afc4c93385b2e71336cc50a0b3e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2013, background): “…reported overall effect sizes near zero, indicating that learning with these technologies, taken as a whole, was not significantly different from regular classroom learning in terms of effectiveness (Bernard et al., 2004; Cavanaugh, 2001; Machtmes & Asher, 2000; Zhao, Lei, Yan, & Tan, 2005).”
A Guide to Authentic e-Learning (2009, result): “While this meta-analysis is excellent in its design and reporting, its findings, as well as those derived from other related metaanalyses (Cavanaugh, 2001; Machtmes & Asher, 2000), fall far short with respect to specifying design guidelines for e-learning.”
The Effects of Distance Education on K-12 Student Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. (2004, unknown): “Adult telecourses 30 -0.0093 Cavanaugh, 2001.”
A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education (2009, unknown): “The reference lists of several earlier reviews were consulted, including Moore (1989); Moore and Thompson (1990); Russell (1999); Machtmes and Asher (2000); Cavanaugh (2001); Allen, Bourhis, Burrell, and Mabry (2002); Olson and Wisher (2002); Shachar and Neumann (2003); Bernard, Abrami, Lou, Borokho”
Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education (2013, background): “…have been conducted which explore the possibility that computer supported education increases the academic achievement of students (Camnalbur, 2008; Cavanaugh, 2001; Demirer, 2006; Drost, 2002; Duman, 2007; Egelioglu, 2008; Karakus, 2008; Shachar, 2002; Tankut, 2008; Wong, 2001; Zhou, Brouwer,…”
Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies (2009, methodology): “Overall, results from Bernard et al. (2004) and other reviews of the distance education literature (Cavanaugh 2001; Moore 1994) indicate no significant differences in effectiveness between distance education and face-to-face education, suggesting that distance education, when it is the only option…”
Recent Developments in Technology and Language Learning: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis (2013, background): “However, a comprehensive review of many studies can get us closer to an answer (e.g., Cavanaugh, 2001; Chapelle, 199 ; Lou, Abrami, & d’Apollonia, 2001; Salaberry, 2001).”
Research and Practice in K-12 Online Learning: A Review of Open Access Literature (2009, methodology): “The range of students enrolling in online learning opportunities is expanding (Barbour & Mulcahy, 2007; Cavanaugh, 2007). Yet the ability of virtual schools to support a broad range of student abilities appears to be limited. After describing the promising results associated with the use of the Educ”
The Validation of One Parental Involvement Measurement in Virtual Schooling. (2010, background): “Student-teacher interaction has been identified as one of the key factors that influence student academic achievement in online learning (Blomeyer, 2002; Cavanaugh, 2001; Cavanaugh, 2007; Cavanaugh et al., 2005; Hughes et al., 2005; NACOL, 2006; Swan, 2002; Swan, 2003; TallentRunnels et al., 2006; Z”
A Comprehensive Look at Distance Education in the K–12 Context (2006, background): “In examining distance education studies, however, Cavanaugh et al. (2004) warn that it is important to differentiate between adult learners and learners in K–12 classroom settings.”
What Makes the Difference? A Practical Analysis of Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education (2005, methodology): “Similarly, although Cavanaugh (2001) did not attempt deliberately to explain the heterogeneity found in her meta-analysis, her grouping the studies into different content areas did suggest that some groups of studies seem to have larger effect sizes than others, suggesting that some content may be”
How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature (2004, unknown): “In addition, the reference lists of several earlier reviews, including those of Moore and Thompson (1990), Russell (1999), Machtmes and Asher (2000), Cavanaugh (2001), Allen et al. (2002), and Shachar (2002), were searched for possible inclusions.”
Effectiveness of using learner‐centered principles on student retention in distance education courses in rural schools (2008, background): “…of online learning is at least as effective as traditional classes in terms of learning outcomes and often more effective (Bernard et al., 2004; Cavanaugh, 2001; Cavanaugh, Gillan, Kromrey, Hess, & Blomeyer, 2004; Cradler, McNabb, Freeman, & Burchett, 2002; Hobbs, 2004; Tallent-Runnels et al.,…”