Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry

By Barry Bozeman, Monica Gaughan. 2007

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3dd0b7cf7f022071ed3d70e3cf764268fe05ad6a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit (2012, background): “, 2009)), previous experience in technology-transfer (D’Este and Patel, 2007), the scale of research resources and access to different sources of funding for research by the various departments (Lee, 1996; Schartinger, et al., 2002; Colyvas, et al., 2002; Bozeman and Gaughan, 2007), and the quality ”
Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academics' perceptions of the barriers to working with industry (2012, background): “…of the academic context of application of the fundamental research, to access resources and skills not available at universities, and to get inspiration for blue-sky research (Rosenberg, 1991; Mansfield and Lee, 1996; Siegel et al., 2004; Breschi et al., 2007; D’Este and Perkmann, 2010).”
An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage in Informal University Technology Transfer (2007, methodology): “Companion research using the same data as herein suggests that this is especially the case for grants and contracts from industry (Bozeman and Gaughan, 2006).”
In good company: : The influence of peers on industry engagement by academic scientists (2012, methodology): “The survey instrument exploited items and scales deployed in previous surveys of academics (Bozeman and Gaughan, 2007, D‟Este and Patel, 2007, Link, Siegel and Bozeman, 2007) and included several questions exploring individuals‟ attitudes towards engagement and entrepreneurship.”
Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants (2011, methodology): “Prior research shows that time spent writing grants is positively associated with conducting research (Bozeman & Gaughan, 2007), but there is no reason to assume that each contributes positively to job satisfaction.”
Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, positive): “…high levels of interactivity with developers of industrial technology to generate high-quality academic outcomes, it is nonetheless resource-intensive and many academics may choose to complement their public science funding with industry funds (Blumenthal et al., 1996; Bozeman and Gaughan, 2007).”
Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment (2008, background): “Past empirical work has established that greater involvement in grant-sponsored research has a direct positive effect on the likelihood that scientists would interact with industry ( Bozeman and Gaughan 2007; Link et al. 2006).”
Technology commercialization: a literature review of success factors and antecedents across different contexts (2016, background): “The research discipline, though, seems to have an impact on the rate of university-industry interactions (Bozeman and Gaughan 2007) and the engagement of academics in the transfer of technologies (Arvanitis et al.”
Building world-class research university: The Brain Korea 21 project (2009, result): “Other studies of research policy have shown that research funds did have an effect on research publications in a variety of contexts ( Bozeman and Gaughan 2007; Goldfarb 2008).”