Differential Roles of Shame and Guilt in L2 Learning: How Bad Is Bad?

By Y. Teimouri. The Modern Language Journal, 2018

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This article aims to introduce shame and guilt from social psychology into second language acquisition (SLA), to validate their psychometric measurement, and to examine their effects on second language (L2) learners' motivation and language achievements. In Study 1, the prevalence of shame and guilt reactions in L2 settings was explored. Moreover, the Second Language Test of Shame and Guilt Affect (L2‐TOSGA) was developed and validated to measure L2 learners' individual differences in terms of proneness to shame and guilt during L2 learning. The results of qualitative and quantitative analyses evidenced the pervasiveness of shame and guilt in an L2 context, and attested to the reliability, stability, and validity of L2‐TOSGA subscales. In Study 2, the effects of learners' shame and guilt reactions on their motivation and language achievements were probed. The results showed that shame strongly but negatively affected L2 learners' motivation and language achievements, whereas guilt had positive effects on their motivation and language achievements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3cf69406c8db0c0d53422c0ff369a4dbaa4a6a7c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

  1. Y. Teimouri
  2. Chengchen Li
  3. Somayeh Tahmouresi
  4. Jean–Marc Dewaele
  5. Mostafa Papi
  6. Luke Plonsky
  7. Lawrence Jun Zhang
  8. Julia Goetze

In Social Psychology

  1. Chengchen Li
  2. Jean–Marc Dewaele
  3. Luke Plonsky
  4. Y. Teimouri
  5. Lawrence Jun Zhang
  6. Somayeh Tahmouresi
  7. Farhad Tabandeh
  8. Mostafa Papi

Citations in the corpus