Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge
By J. Rotgans, Henk G. Schmidt. 2014
258 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3bb0f8f87d7a49c338b709f34d750b86bed46616
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Altay Eren
- H. Coşkun
- J. Rotgans
- Henk G. Schmidt
- Judith M. Harackiewicz
- Jessi L. Smith
- Chris S. Hulleman
In Education
- Altay Eren
- H. Coşkun
- J. Rotgans
- Henk G. Schmidt
- Judith M. Harackiewicz
- Jessi L. Smith
- Suzanne Hidi
- K. Ann Renninger
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Jessi L. Smith
- J. Rotgans
- Henk G. Schmidt
- Altay Eren
- H. Coşkun
- Stacy J. Priniski
- Judith M. Harackiewicz
- Suzanne Hidi
Citations in the corpus
- Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education (2016, background): “…that intriguing problems (e.g., why the Japanese were able to conquer Singapore during World War II despite being highly outnumbered) can be effective for eliciting situational interest, but that interest may decline once students discover the answer to the problem (Rotgans & Schmidt, 2014).”
- Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest (2017, background): “…the arousal of situational interest by appropriate precipitating events, such as puzzles or problems, is hard-wired and therefore—in principle—affecting every individual (Berlyne, 1954, 1962, 1978; Kang, Scharmann, Kang, & Noh, 2010; Kang et al., 2009; Loewenstein, 1994; Rotgans & Schmidt, 2014b).”
- Students' level of boredom, boredom coping strategies, epistemic curiosity, and graded performance (2016, background): “Given that epistemic curiosity is significantly and positively related to student engagement, knowledge seeking, and deeper understanding of knowledge (Litman, 2005; Richards et al., 2013; Rotgans & Schmidt, 2014), the prominent role of epistemic curiosity in graded performance can be understood.”