The Social Identity Perspective

By M. Hogg, Dominic Abrams, S. Otten, S. Hinkle. 2004

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ad393fd795f6d2b47517d4b210b16483b3a1e4f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents’ friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption (2006, background): “Such segregation phenomena have in the first place been studied in small group experiments in the context of social identity theory (Hogg et al. 2004) or on the macro level (Bourdieu 1984), but it is not clear to what degree the macro phenomena charted by the latter type of research can be explained”
Loneliness and physical activity: A systematic review (2016, background): “By being physically active together, members of a physical activity group have distinct goals and INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY 253 behaviors, develop a specific social identity, and might feel socially attracted to each other (see Hogg, 2005).”
The language that gets people to give: phrases that predict success on kickstarter (2014, background): “Social Identity Social identity is an individual’s knowledge that he belongs to a social group, in which individuals have common attributes and identify themselves in similar ways [25, 46].”
The differential effect of team members' trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion (2010, background): “Consistent with the critique of how cohesion is conceptualized (specially, in terms of the interpersonal attraction to the group, see Hogg et al., 2004), only the 9 items from the two subscales called “group integration task” and “social group integration” were selected and eventually aggregated…”
Rival conceptions of rivalry: why some competitions mean more than others (2015, unknown): “Social classifications via group identification benefit individuals by reducing social uncertainty regarding one’s place within the environment and providing the opportunity for self-esteem enhancement through favorable group comparison (Festinger, 1954; Hogg, 2005).”
Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms (2006, background): “…that because in-group prototypes are self-defining, people in salient groups pay close attention to the prototype, to information that delineates the prototype, and to people who provide information about the prototype (Hogg, 2005a; also see Reicher's, 1984, 2001, analysis of crowd behavior).”