Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms

By M. Hogg, Scott A. Reid. 2006

1,352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e89ac123954077c1b1135928a8dcf0db0a44c0fd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Inclusive Leadership: How Leaders Sustain or Discourage Work Group Inclusion (2021, background): “While in-group membership is advantageous in many ways, it also can require a level of compliance to group norms that reduces the fulfillment of human needs for uniqueness (Hogg & Reid, 2006).”
Intergroup Leadership in Organizations: Leading Across Group and Organizational Boundaries (2012, background): “…shared collective identity through rhetoric, invoking and describing the collective identity in ways that suggest specific attributes of the shared identity that are in line with the leader’s vision (e.g., Hogg & Reid, 2006; Reicher & Hopkins, 2003; Seyranian & Bligh, 2008; Shamir et al., 1993).”
A Re‐Explication of Social Norms, Ten Years Later (2015, background): “Findings support the hypothesis that group identity moderates the relationship between descriptive norms and behavioral intention (e.g., Glynn, 2012; Hogg & Reid, 2006; Lapinski, Anderson et al., 2013; Rimal & Real, 2005), with the effects of descriptive norms becoming stronger as group identity…”
Explaining Gender‐Based Language Use: Effects of Gender Identity Salience on References to Emotion and Tentative Language in Intra‐ and Intergroup Contexts (2008, background): “When depersonalized, people cognitively, affectively, and behaviorally assimilate to the in-group prototype (Hogg & Reid, 2006).”
Social identity framing communication strategies for mobilizing social change (2014, background): “Hogg and Reid (2006) contend that this is done through “norm talk”.”
Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: a meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research (2017, background): “…allows them to be ‘entrepreneurs of identity’ (Reicher & Hopkins, 1996) who not only construct and manage perceptions of the group prototype and thus the group’s identity, but also manage how prototypical they themselves are viewed by the group (e.g., Hogg & Reid, 2006; Seyranian & Bligh, 2008).”
Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social–Psychological Perspective (2013, background): “2), increasing institutional transaction costs and adversely affecting institutional effectiveness (Ahn et al. 2003; cf. Weber et al. 2004, Hogg and Reid 2006).”
Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion (2021, background): “For example, Hogg and Reid articulated the role of social identity in communicative group norms, concluding that group norms are not fixed phenomena but they are fluid and context dependent (Hogg & Reid, 2006).”
Explaining Group Influence: The Role of Identity and Emotion in Political Conformity and Polarization (2015, background): “…distinguish between “informational influence” (“true” influence based on information) and “normative influence” (surface compliance due to an effort to ingratiate oneself with peers) (Deutsch and Gerard [1955] 1965) but others have challenged this dichotomy (e.g., Turner 1987; Hogg and Reid 2006).”