Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective

By André Gold, Arvind Malhotra, Albert H. Segars. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001

6,315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3a219bde642e180756daaafc44abf6ab10fbb669

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Purchase Intention and the Mediation Effect of Customer Attitude (2017, positive): “As shown in Table 3, all values for reflective constructs passed the threshold value of HTMT <0.85 (Kline 2010) and HTMT<0.90 (Gold et al. 2001), thereby indicating that discriminate validity of the measurement model was ascertained.”
Relationships among organizational culture, knowledge acquisition, organizational learning, and organizational innovation in Taiwan's banking and insurance industries (2012, background): “According to the definition of Gold et al. (2001), KA can be divided into two dimensions: internal creation and external acquisition.”
The theoretical foundations of knowledge management (2006, background): “The development of effective knowledge capabilities supports key aspects of organizational performance measurement (Baskerville & Pries-Heje, 1999; Gold et al ., 2001).”
Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Innovation: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Moderating Effect of the Environment (2019, positive): “Organizational capabilities emerge through the strategic application and complex interactions of resources that a firm owns or is capable of controlling, and the most effective means of orchestrating and deploying them (Gold & Arvind Malhotra, 2001).”
Repatriating knowledge: variables influencing the “transfer” process (2009, background): “Gold et al. (2001) argue that norms and trust mechanisms are an important part of the infrastructure of a firm that values knowledge acquisition.”
Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: an Integrative Role for Learning?* (2008, background): “…infrastructures are presented as a pipeline to knowledge codiﬁcation and organization (Alavi and Leidner, 2001; Davenport and Prusak, 1998; Gold, Malhotra and Segars, 2001) and to extensive knowledge transfer (Davenport and Prusak, 1998; Ko, Kirsch and King, 2005; Van den Brink, 2003) as…”
Workforce agility: the new employee strategy for the knowledge economy (2002, methodology): “This nding is supported by the literature, suggesting that effective collaboration for problem solving, knowledge sharing and innovation is key to realizing the business value of employees (Gray, 2000; Gold et al., 2001).”
Communications of the Association for Information Systems (2011, neutral): ““The ultimate goal is to bind all trading community systems together in such a way that any application can access any method or any piece of data without delay to support any business process” [Linthicum, 2001].”
Organizational Factors to Support Knowledge Management and Innovation (2011, methodology): “…of experimentation and tolerance of mistakes for knowledge sharing (DeTienne and Jackson, 2001), the promotion of trust, confidence and openness (Gold et al., 2001; Lee and Choi, 2003), a sense of a common intention for all organizational members (Jarvenpaa and Staples, 2003), empowerment…”
How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents (2020, background): “While some researchers suggest a threshold of 0.85 (Henseler et al., 2015; Clark and Watson, 1995; Kline, 2011), others propose a threshold of 0.90 (Gold et al., 2001; Teo et al., 2008; Henseler et al., 2015).”
A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation (2004, background): “Adopting Pan and Scarbrouth (1998) classification scheme for resources, key KM resources are classified in the following order: (1) the technical KM resource comprising the physical IT infrastructure components, and its KM capability (Gold et al., 2001; Lee & Choi, 2003), (2) the social KM resource ”