Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues, 5th ed.

By R. Kaplan, D. Saccuzzo. 2001

418 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37c11f96f348a0915bb8ea5a342f6e21634e02cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Polychronicity, Big Five Personality Dimensions, and Sales Performance (2005, unknown): “In addition, Conte and Jacobs (2003) found that polychronicity had a low correlation (r = .13) with the Wonderlic Personnel Test, which is a reliable and valid measure of cognitive ability (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2004; Murphy & Davidshofer, 2005).”
The Financial Management Behavior Scale (2010, background): “Measures that possess criterion validity predict variables that they would be expected to predict if they truly measured what they claimed to measure (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2009; Silva, 1993).”
Improving Middle School Students’ Science Literacy Through Reading Infusion (2010, background): “These indices are within the acceptable ranges from a psychometric perspective (Crocker & Algina, 1986; Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2001).”
The Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) (2000, background): “Within the USA, performance on this instrument is a major determinant in the career choices of over 1.3 million young women and men per annum (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 1997).”
Attachment to God: Measurement and Dynamics (2003, background): “From this perspective, the high Cronbach’s alphas may not reflect item redundancy as much as the ‘tight’ boundaries that surround the highly focused nature of the God attachment construct (see Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2001).”
The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the Big 5 factor markers1 (2010, methodology): “The coefficients indicate that all three scales performed within an acceptable range of reliability (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2001, p. 122), and are presented in Table 3, along with other scale statistics for the US sample (and comparative statistics from below, in Study 2).”
Cross-lagged relations between task motivation and performance in arithmetic and literacy in kindergarten (2009, methodology): “The KudereRichardson reliabilities (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2001) assessed for Arithmetic Performance were 0.88 at Time 1 and 0.83 at Time 2.”
The development and psychometric properties evaluation of the Indonesian version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) (2018, methodology): “INTRODUCTION 13 Ch ap te r 1 Ch ap te r 6 Ch ap te r 2 Ch ap te r 7 Ch ap te r 3 Ch ap te r 8 Ch ap te r 4 Ch ap te r 5 Before the development of the Alpha and Beta tests, the army relied on tests such as the Stanford-Binet scale, which heavily emphasized verbal ability (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2018).”
Factor Analysis in Counseling Research and Practice (2013, background): “Around the mid-1900s, when the psychological testing movement in American schools was in full force (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2010), English psychologist and statistician Charles Spearman (1939) coined the term ‘‘factor analysis’’ to describe a mathematical approach to determining the underlying patterns…”
Assessing Recidivism Risk Across Female Pathways to Crime (2006, background): “The coefficient (κ = .76), which can range from −1.00 to 1.00, indicates “excellent” agreement (Kaplan & Saccuzzo, 2001, pp. 115–118).”
A review and critique of emotional intelligence measures. (2005, background): “Mayer et al. (2000) found that the MSCEIT and Bar-On scales correlated 0.”