Creativity.4in1: Four-Criterion Construct of Creativity

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Dynamic Definition of Creativity (2019, background): “Some definitional proposals add additional criteria, that is, high quality (Sternberg & Lubart, 1995), contrasting with conformity (Niu & Sternberg, 2002), surprise (Boden, 2004), non-obviousness (Simonton, 2012), aesthetic and authentic (Kharkhurin, 2014).”
Is creativity without intelligence possible? A Necessary Condition Analysis (2016, background): “Even if sometimes other creativity criteria are added, including the expectation that a creative product will be surprising (Simonton, 2012) or characterized by an esthetic value and authenticity (Kharkhurin, 2014), the combination of originality and value/usefulness is most often seen as essential ”
On the Usefulness of “Value” in the Definition of Creativity (2015, background): “This three-criterion view was carried further by Simonton (2012), who lamented the lack of agreement among researchers concerning the definition of the critical concepts in the study of creativity (see also Kharkhurin, 2014; Piffer, 2012).”
Potential Originality and Effectiveness: The Dynamic Definition of Creativity (2016, background): “Therefore, by defining in a comprehensive way the criteria of originality and effectiveness, the standard definition of creativity can be argued to remain valid also in the sense advocated by Kharkhurin (2014).”