On the Usefulness of “Value” in the Definition of Creativity
By R. Weisberg. 2015
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00afa682d854b4d3253115739b3394acf192bcb6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- Ethno-Stem Project-Based Learning: Its Impact to Critical and Creative Thinking Skills (2020, background): “Creativity is operationalized as a combination of fluency, innovation, novelty and imagination (Weisberg, 2015).”
- An exploration of how creativity, functionality, and aesthetics are related in design (2021, background): “, useful, adaptive concerning task constraints)’ (Sternberg and Lubart 1998); ‘the production of novel, useful products’ (Mumford 2003); ‘a response to the continual innovation and resourcefulness that have become necessary for economic survival’ (Craft 2003); ‘the ability to come up with ideas or a”
- Ingredients of Creativity: Originality and More (2017, background): “Undaunted by the size of the task, over the last 70 years a number of researchers have attempted to develop such a universal definition (Cardoso de Sousa, 2008; Corazza, 2016; Freedman, 2010; Morgan, 1953; Rhodes, 1961; Runco & Jaeger, 2012; Weisberg, 2015).”
- Potential Originality and Effectiveness: The Dynamic Definition of Creativity (2016, methodology): “Elimination of value judgment was therefore justified by Weisberg (2015) as a way to try to avoid introducing forms of subjectivity in assessing a product, a time-dependent practice which could lead a person to change his or her status from noncreative to creative (or vice versa) after death, and…”