Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress
By N. Willard. 2007
616 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/369278ad3ea8e18223b923b6403e40cfd56d2e37
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Robin M. Kowalski
- Gary W. Giumetti
- Cynthia Van Hee
- Bertie Vidgen
- Amber N. Schroeder
- Gayle Brewer
- Lucas Dixon
- Petra Gradinger
Citations in the corpus
- Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale (2016, methodology): “To generate a corpus of discussion comments, we processed the public dump of the full history of English Wikipedia as described in Appendix A.”
- Using Machine Learning to Detect Cyberbullying (2011, background): “In other words, we were willing to accept some false positives in order to increase the percentage of true positives that could be identified by the tool.”
- School Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Boys and Girls: Roles and Overlap (2017, methodology): “Students’ involvement in cyberbullying was measured with five cyberbullying and five cybervictimization items derived from The Students’ Needs Assessment Scale (Willard, 2007): flaming, denigration, impersonation, outing, and exclusion.”
- Cyberbullying Definition Among Adolescents: A Comparison Across Six European Countries (2012, unknown): “Studies have shown that different types of cyberbullying can be differentiated with regard to aspects, such as the covert or overt nature of the acts, the electronic devices/ media used to bully others, or specific behaviors.(9,14,16,21,26,27) Starting from Willard’s listing of cyberbullying behavio”
- Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. (2014, background): “Willard (2007) has created a taxonomy of types of cyberbullying that includes flaming (i.e., an online fight), harassment (i.e., repetitive, offensive messages sent to a target), outing and trickery (i.e., soliciting personal information from someone and then electronically sharing that information…”
- Differences between Peer Victimization in Cyber and Physical Settings and Associated Psychosocial Adjustment in Early Adolescence (2009, background): “Also, it may be important to extend the cyber victimization behaviors listed in the measure to conform with the range of behaviors described by Willard (2007).”
- Predictors of victimisation across direct bullying, indirect bullying and cyberbullying (2012, background): “Anonymity of the aggressor, moreover, may foster feelings of insecurity in the victim (Willard 2007).”
- Cyber-Victimisation: The Association Between Help-Seeking Behaviours and Self-Reported Emotional Symptoms in Australia and Austria (2010, background): “For example, cyberbullying can happen 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (Willard, 2007).”
- Cyberbullying in Greek Adolescents: The Role of Parents☆ (2014, background): “Cyberbullying is a multidimensional and multiform phenomenon which may take the following forms: cyberstalking, exclusion, denigration, online harassment, impersonation, outing, flaming, trickery, happy slapping (Campbell, 2005; Dilmac & Aydoğan, 2010; Gasior, 2009; Makri-Botsari, 2010a; Willard, 20”
- Adding Insult to Injury: Bullying Experiences of Youth With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2010, background): “Reynolds, 2003), can involve social exclusion (Beran & Violato, 2004), or can be achieved through electronic means using “cyberbullying” (Willard, 2007).”
- Prevalence, Psychological Impact, and Coping of Cyberbully Victims Among College Students (2012, background): “It combined components of several questionnaires from previous cyberbullying studies (Beran & Li, 2005; Raskauskas & Stoltz, 2007; Smith et al., 2006; Willard, 2007).”
- Automatic detection of cyberbullying in social media text (2018, background): “Additionally, different forms of cyberbullying have been identified (O’Sullivan & Flanagin, 2003; Price & Dalgleish, 2010; Willard, 2007) and compared with forms of traditional or offline bullying (Vandebosch & Van Cleemput, 2009).”
- Cyber Worlds: New Playgrounds for Bullying (2011, background): “School authorities have had a difficult time supervising online activities, knowing when to involve law enforcement, and distinguishing first amendment rights of freedom of expression from harassment (Shariff & Hoff, 2007; Willard, 2007).”
- Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy (2013, background): “As the selective and purposeful choice of addressees creates a group of recipients who share and approve of such standards of behaviour (Willard, 2006), we expected that the chance of negative bystander behaviour would be greater in private forms of violence.”
- Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness (2015, background): “Furthermore, the often anonymous nature of the interaction, speed of distribution, permanence of material and constant availability of victims can exacerbate the negative impact on bullying victims (Willard, 2007).”