The Significance of Biology for Human Development: A Developmental Psychobiological Systems View

By G. Gottlieb, D. Wahlsten, R. Lickliter. 2007

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31ef3303dd4ba5e34244abf96a4fb8a3d07835ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. A. Masten
2. David C. Witherington
3. W. Overton
4. Kurt W. Fischer
5. D. Cicchetti
6. W. Curtis
7. R. Lerner
8. D. Osher

In Education

1. A. Masten
2. David C. Witherington
3. D. Cicchetti
4. W. Curtis
5. Kurt W. Fischer
6. W. Overton
7. M. Ungar
8. D. Osher

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. David C. Witherington
2. Kurt W. Fischer
3. A. Masten
4. D. Cicchetti
5. W. Overton
6. W. Curtis

Citations in the corpus

• Developmental cascades (2010, background): “Theoretically, these effects reflect the processes (transactions; coactions) by which interactions influence development in complex living systems (Ford & Lerner, 1992; Gottlieb, 1998, 2007; Sameroff, 2000; Thelen & Smith, 1998; Ward, 1995).”
• Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises (2007, unknown): “Developmental theorists have emphasized multilevel dynamics for some time (Cicchetti, 1990; Ford & Lerner, 1992; Gottesman, 1974; Gottlieb, 1998; Sameroff, 2000; Sroufe, 1979, 1997; Thelen & Smith, 1998; Waddington, 1957; Weiss, 1959).”
• The Science of the Individual (2013, background): “Traditional models usually assume that behavior is stable, and therefore they ignore the influence of context, focusing instead on averages to reveal ‘‘true’’ behavior (or ability or knowledge) (Gottlieb et al., 1998).”
• The developing brain and neural plasticity: Implications for normality, psychopathology, and resilience. (2015, background): “In contemporary developmental psychobiology, the system viewpoint is represented most elegantly in the writings of Gilbert Gottlieb (1983, 1992; Gottlieb et al., 1998).”
• A New Paradigm for Developmental Science: Relationism and Relational-Developmental Systems (2013, background): “In this framework, the concepts reciprocal determination (Overton & Reese, 1973); co-action, (Gottlieb et al., 2006), fusion, (Greenberg, 2011; Partridge, 2011) as well as relational bidirectional(<–>) causality (Lerner, 2006), relational causality (Gottlieb, 2003), and circular causality (Withering”
• Developmental psychopathology: Pathways to the future (2006, unknown): “…psychopathology derive in large part from common features of contemporary developmental theories (Baltes, Reese, & Lipsitt, 1980; Cicchetti, 1990b; Cicchetti & Rogosch, 1996; Gottlieb, 1998; Lerner, 1998; Rutter & Sroufe, 2000; Sameroff, 2000a, 2000b; Sroufe, 1997; Thelen & Smith, 1998).”
• The Dynamic Systems Approach as Metatheory for Developmental Psychology (2007, background): “Explaining a novel, emergent pattern and form in development by appeal to a single source that houses the potential, the instructions or the plan for the pattern harks back to preformationist thinking but within the context of an epigenetic framework, the kind of perspective Gottlieb [1983; Gottlieb”