Voice Climate, Work Outcomes, and the Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment
By M. Frazier, Stav Fainshmidt. 2012
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/31bc37873c895da1141358ad679ffe3f9a77615a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Leveraging the employee voice: a multi-level social learning perspective of ethical leadership (2019, background): “…we argued for the social learning mechanism of role modeling, we did not measure other forms of psychological processes that might influence voice behavior, such as LMX (Mahsud et al., 2010), organizational identification (DeConinck, 2011), and psychological ownership (Frazier & Fainshmidt, 2012).”
- What Facilitates Dynamic Capabilities? The Role of Organizational Climate for Trust (2017, background): “…has argued that climate for trust is foundational in that it has a broad “bandwidth” on which more specific climates can develop (e.g., voice climate; Frazier and Fainshmidt, 2012; Schneider et al., 1998) and it serves as a foundation for a range of sustained organization member attitudes,…”
- Authentic leadership and teachers’ voice behaviour: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of interpersonal trust (2020, background): “Teachers who feel highly capable of performing their work (competence) and have influence over what happens at school (impact), are more likely to consider the probability that voice will be effective and, therefore, engage in voice behaviours (Frazier and Fainshmidt, 2012).”