Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments.

By Philippe Pinel, Manuela Piazza, Denis Le Bihan, Stanislas Dehaene. Neuron, 2004

718 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3108503917679e06cdcf9627038ce5d134ba63af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. (2004, background): “the requested IPS (Pinel et al., 2004; Nieder and Miller, 2004) or the”
Cultural recycling of cortical maps. (2007, positive): “…that neuronal populations coding for number are highly distributed in the intraparietal sulcus and are intertwined and overlapping with representations of other quantitative parameters (Pinel et al., 2004)—a conclusion supported by recent monkey physiology (Tudusciuc and Nieder, 2007, see below).”
Early childhood teacher education: the case of geometry (2011, background): “Research even suggests that the ability to represent magnitude is dependent on visual-spatial systems in regions of the parietal cortex of the brain (Geary 2007; Pinel et al. 2004; Zorzi et al. 2002).”
A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. (2007, background): “Indeed, magnitude effects are shared properties of a great variety of mental representations (e.g., size, sound intensity, etc.) that probably have little in common (Cohen Kadosh et al., 2005; Pinel et al., 2004).”
Origins and Development of Generalized Magnitude Representation (2011, background): “Consistent with this possibility is neural evidence showing involvement of similar parietal and frontal regions for prothetic [80,97–100], metathetic [80,101], and more complex social dimensions [96].”
Development of Mathematical Understanding. (2007, background): “, McDonald & White, 1993; Thompson & Krupa, 1994), although they are beginning to be explored in mathematical domains (Dehaene et al., 1999; Pinel et al., 2004).”
Small Sounds, Big Deals: Phonetic Symbolism Effects in Pricing (2010, positive): “Studies using fMRI brain-imaging technology confirm that the processing of various forms of quantitative information has a common neural basis and that the activated processing substrate occurs in the vicinity of the intraparietal sulcus (Pesenti et al. 2000; Pinel et al. 2004; Seron and Fias 2006).”
Cognitive neuroscience: acting on numbers. (2004, positive): “[7] has investigated this issue in a particularly elegant manner.”