A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex.

By Manuela Piazza, Philippe Pinel, Denis Le Bihan, Stanislas Dehaene. Neuron, 2007

815 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1f20c60ecb76df7c6850082bf3b8a42091d302a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Representation of number in the brain. (2009, background): “…l ch an ge to d ev ia nt nu m be rs (% ) Deviation ratio (log scale) Adaptation to numerosity of sets of dots (Piazza et al. 2004) Coss-notation adaptation (Piazza et al. 2007) Distant number w = 0.252 0 3 6 9 1 Dots (among dots) 2 Dots (among arabic) 3 Arabic (among arabic) 4 Arabic (among…”
A visual sense of number. (2007, background): “Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies also point to their existence in a the intraparietal sulcus in humans, both for symbolic [12, 20, 21] and nonsym-bolic [22] representation of numbers.”
Multiple components of developmental dyscalculia (2013, background): “Neuroimaging studies suggest a similar type of neural coding in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) of humans [39,40].”
Effects of an Adaptive Game Intervention on Accessing Number Sense in Low-Socioeconomic-Status Kindergarten Children (2009, background): “…that much work in numerical cognition is now focusing on non-symbolic measures (Barth et al., 2006; Cantlon et al., 2006; McCrink & Wynn, 2004; Piazza et al., 2007) and that the use of non-symbolic tests has been advocated as a more direct measure of number sense in children (Wilson &…”
Is 2 + 2 = 4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations (2011, methodology): “A similar interpretation in number processing was given by Piazza et al. (2007).”
Cultural recycling of cortical maps. (2007, positive): “Second, monkey intraparietal neurons are each tuned to a particular numerosity and show Gaussian variability on a log scale (Nieder and Merten, 2007; Nieder and Miller, 2003, 2004), similar to inferences derived from behavioral and fMRI adaptation studies in humans (Piazza et al., 2004, 2007).”
Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain (2008, result): “Recent studies have provided support for some of the different predictions (summation and place coding) of this mode”
Natural Number and Natural Geometry (2011, background): “Most important, activation to dot arrays of a given number produces adaptation of neural responses to symbolic arrays and the reverse [39], and fine-grained cortical responses to particular numbers of dots can be predicted from cortical responses to the corresponding symbolic numbers [40].”
Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation (2007, background): “Cerebral convergence of symbolic and nonsymbolic information Manuela Piazza, Philippe Pinel and I recently used fMRI adaptation to test directly the hypothesis of common neural populations for symbolic numerals and nonsymbolic numerosities (Piazza et al., 2006).”