The Convergent Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and Creativity Interest Inventories

By Maria M. Clapham. 2004

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30d61c991ebc1697af52fe160a20be9363f92e02

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains (2011, background): “Near-zero correlations between purportedly complementary indicators of creativity have also been reported (Clapham 2004).”
Ready, Set, Create: What Instructing People to "Be Creative" Reveals About the Meaning and Mechanisms of Divergent Thinking (2014, background): “…as ideal time limits (Benedek et al., 2013), whether to have a play-like atmosphere (Vernon, 1971), and differences between prompts and task types (e.g., verbal vs. visual tasks or uses vs. consequences prompts; Almeida, Prieto, Ferrando, Oliveira, & Ferrándiz, 2008; Clapham, 2004; Silvia, 2011).”
Creativity versus conscientiousness : Which is a better predictor of student performance? (2006, background): “Indeed, a recent study reports that self-reported creativity (in terms of creative interests and attitudes) bears little relationship to creative thinking processes (Clapham, 2004).”
Creativity and Well‐being: A Meta‐analysis (2020, background): “They may be verbal, figural, or mixed, and could trigger somewhat different cognitive operations (Clapham, 2004; Richardson, 1986).”
Building a test to assess creative and critical thinking simultaneously (2010, unknown): “…creative thinking as a process, based on research evidences that have been documented by scholars (Maisel, 2007; Weisberg, 2006; Karwowski, 2006; Clapham, 2004; Simonton, 2003; Schultz, Tannenbaum & Lauterborn, 1996; Isaksen, Dorval & Treffinger, 1994; Davis, 1992; Khatena, 1992; Besemer &…”
Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review (2017, background): “…questionnaires ask individuals about their past creative production instead of personality traits, based on the assumption that past accomplishments can provide a dependable indication of subsequent creative accomplishments (Clapham, 2004; Colangelo, Kerr, Hallowell, Huesman, & Gaeth, 1992).”
Creativity and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis (2017, background): “…Thinking–Drawing Production (TCT-DP) by Urban and Jellen (Urban, 1991; Karwowski & Gralewski, 2013), the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT; Clapham, 2004; Torrance, 1968), and other instruments (e.g., the Remote Associates Test, Mednick, 1963, or the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test,…”
The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking - Figural or Verbal: Which One Should We Use? (2017, background): “, Clapham, 2004; Ulger, 2015) have specifically examined the relationships between the two versions. Both reported a significant relationship between the two versions (e.g., r = .36, p < .01 in Clapham, 2004; r = .25, p = .01 in Ulger, 2015). Only Ulger (2015) has examined the relationships between ”
Self-Reported Differences in Creativity by Ethnicity and Gender (2006, background): “Many of these debates focus on whether creativity can truly be measured across one or two domains (Baer, 1993; Plucker, 1999), and whether the complex construct of creativity can be measured validly by ‘narrow’ psychometric tests (e.g. Baer, 1994; Clapham, 2004).”
Subjective scoring of divergent thinking: Examining the reliability of unusual uses, instances, and consequences tasks. (2011, background): “It is important to consider several task types because it is currently controversial whether different kinds of tasks are interchangeable (Almeida et al., 2008, Clapham, 2004 and Kuhn and Holling, 2009).”
The Efficacy of Teaching Creativity: Assessment of Student Creative Thinking Before and After Exercises (2011, methodology): “…generate multiple alternative solutions (Cramond, Matthews-Morgan, Bandalos, & Zuo, 2005; Torrance & Goff, 1989), attitude and interest inventories (Clapham, 2004), personality inventories (Gough, 1979), biographical inventories (Amabile, 2001), and self-reported creative activities and…”