Self-Reported Differences in Creativity by Ethnicity and Gender

By James C. Kaufman. 2006

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1f1911521975aea656c2d8ba36f9aee8e05541c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Knowledge workers' creativity and the role of the physical work environment (2011, background): “Kaufman (2006) suggests that gender differences in self-reported creativity are domain-dependent.”
Identifying and Assessing Creativity as a Component of Giftedness (2012, background): “Almost all measures of creativity show less ethnicity and gender biases than standard IQ and achievement tests (J. C. Kaufman, 2006, 2010).”
Improving Creative Thinking Skills of Students through Differentiated Science Inquiry Integrated with Mind Map (2017, background): “Some claimed that gender did not give a significant difference to creative thinking skills (Baer & Kaufman, 2008; Bakir & Oztekin, 2014; Charyton & Snelbecker, 2007; Kaufman, 2006; Potur & Barkul, 2009; Tsai, 2013).”
The Relations of Gender and Personality Traits on Different Creativities: A Dual-Process Theory Account (2012, background): “Inconsistent results of gender differences in creativity have been obtained in the past (J. C. Kaufman, 2006).”
Expertise, Domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique. (2009, methodology): “…one to three in this study, which did not allow assessments of inter-rater reliability or sufficient data on how expert and 1 It is important to distinguish expert ratings used for the CAT from self-ratings used to analyze people’s self-perceptions of their own creativity (e.g., Kaufman, 2006).”
Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review (2020, background): “That is, males typically rate themselves better at most things than women including having greater creative selfefficacy, especially within scientific and competitive contexts (Hughes, Furnham, & Batey, 2013; Kaufman, 2006).”
Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. (2012, methodology): “The first CDQ (Kaufman, 2006) contained 56 items, each answered on a six-point scale.”
Counting the Muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS) (2012, unknown): “Expanding on this work, Kaufman and colleagues (Kaufman, 2006; Kaufman, Cole, & Baer, 2009) developed the Creativity Domain Questionnaire (CDQ), which consisted of 56 different creative domains.”
The Yin and Yang of entrepreneurship: Gender differences in the importance of communal and agentic characteristics for entrepreneurs' subjective well-being and performance (2019, background): “This finding is mirrored in women's and men's self-perceptions, with men's self-ratings of overall creativity (Jonason et al., 2015) and business-related creativity (Kaufman, 2006) being higher than women's self-ratings.”
On the Cognitive Benefits of Cultural Experience: Exploring the Relationship between Studying Abroad and Creative Thinking (2012, background): “Based on our findings, we suggest that cultural experiences from living abroad have wide reaching benefits on students’ creativity, 3 Research examining gender differences in creativity show mixed results; some studies report no gender differences, while other report opposing findings regarding male”
The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes (2013, background): “studies examining gender differences in creativity aremixed (Kaufman, 2006);”
The Construct of Creativity: Structural Model for Self‐Reported Creativity Ratings (2009, background): “For more information about item-level differences by ethnicity and gender, see Kaufman (2006).”