From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities

By Jason Owen-Smith. 2003

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3085acebe5a3dfd58f846771a24933d41bbf58a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Statistics and Probability

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community (2004, background): “Institutional differences between PROs and for-profit organizations stem from: (1) their disparate approaches to rules for the dissemination and use of scientific findings (Dasgupta and David 1987, 1994; Owen-Smith 2003), and (2) sharply divergent selection environments.”
Industry Induces Academic Science to Know Less about More1 (2010, background): “Owen-Smith (2003) has demonstrated that universities and firms have recently come to be evaluated on convergent criteria.”
Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations (2009, background): “In similar vein, others argue that universities and industry are converging towards a hybrid order where the differences between scholarly and commercial logics are becoming blurred (Owen-Smith, 2003).”
Role Strain in University Research Centers (2007, background): “…students and examine “graduate students as tokens of exchange between Role Strain in University Research Centers academe and industry” (2002, p. 294); Owen-Smith (2003) provides what is perhaps the most useful tag, noting the movement of universities and industry “from separate systems to…”
Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages (2011, unknown): “On the one hand, only a minority of universities have the capacity to engage in patenting activities and the creation of spin-offs (Owen-Smith 2003).”
Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, unknown): “This means collaboration may be more strongly driven by complementarities, achieved by working with industrial partners and pursuing academic research, rather than a single-minded focus on commercial success (Owen-Smith, 2003).”
How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry (2006, background): “The existing literature, which does attempt to address variations across scientific institutions in the success with which university science is commercialized, on the one hand consists of studies that focus on the practices of technology-licensing offices (Mowery et al., 2004; Sampat et al., 2003; ”
Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science (2007, background): “However, in assessing the conditions that affect the degree to which an innovation is accumulative, we make no claim as to its ability to be disruptive.”
Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: the confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology (2007, background): “These debates have provoked a surge of interest in the commercialization of science, the changing relation between university and industry more generally and the consequences that ensue when universities adopt an entrepreneurial orientation towards scientific research (Slaughter and Rhoades, 1993, 2”
Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? (2006, unknown): “Recently, Owen-Smith (2003) highlighted the changed relationships between commercial and academic systems.”
From Privatised to Hybrid Corporatised Higher Education: A Global Financial Management Discourse (2012, unknown): “In a sense, public sector universities live as public sector organisations but with commercial imperatives: effectively being hybrid corporations (Mackintosh et al., 1994; Mouwen, 2000; Yudoff, 2002; Owen-Smith, 2003; and Gunasekara, 2006).”