How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry

By S. Jong. 2006

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a42daf6f815fd995f16096728644d2905d2e4736

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Crossing the Rubicon: exploring the factors that shape academics' perceptions of the barriers to working with industry (2012, background): “…to initiate interactions with industry partners in the context of 660 V. Tartari et al. at U niversity of B ath, L ibrary on D ecem ber 23, 2014 http://cje.oxfordjournals.org/ D ow nloaded from their research activities (Owen-Smith and Powell, 2001; Feldman and Desrochers, 2004; Jong, 2006).”
Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model (2009, background): “The preponderance of these spinoffs came after 1980, and spin-off formation accelerated in the 1990s, which roughly 32 Despite the critical importance of Stanford " s TLO as a model, the most important early Bay Area biotechnology firms were spin-offs of the University of California, San Francisco (”
The spill-over theory reversed: The impact of regional economies on the commercialization of university science (2013, background): “The presence of edical schools is an important driver of commercialization in the iomedical field due to the importance of clinical studies in validat- ng efficacy and safety in humans of molecules discovered through asic laboratory research (see e.g. Jong, 2006; Kenney, 1986).”
Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries (2009, background): “The important roles these organizations play as anchors and intermediaries within their regions cannot be overstated, as they provide more open sources of information and knowledge than do proprietary fi rms and face fewer competitive selection pressures (Jong, 2006; Casper, 2007; Colyvas, 2007).”